In the housing argument they both miss that making housing more like a market could lead to more people living in NYC. Like, it isn't a completely fixed asset, housing can be more dense! And then more people get to benefit.

It isn't purely a quesiton of who gets to live in NYC it's about getting more housing to exist.

[-]Nathan Young3h-10

While I don't love Destiny's debate style, I think he makes a great point about reciprocation (here-ish). I need to believe that it's unsustainable to have one side that embages in good debate norms, and the other side that isn't willing to at all.

It at least makes sense not to be too upset over Kirk's death if Republicans won't do the same over Reiner's. Likewise while aethetically I don't like Gavin Newsom's posts. I think they serve as a balancing force to Trump's rhetoric.

Finally, I've long thought that it makes sense for democrats to gerrymander places if the Republicans are going to gerrymander.

Which leaves me sort of confused as my position here. I don't like destiny's crowing over the deaths of Trump supporters. But I find it hard to condemn in the face of the game theory of the situation if republicans often do similar things ( which I think they do).