Veganism:
I though pretty strong, though doesn't deal with how hard and tiring veganism is. I feel I can do a lot more good if I'm not vegan, hence I offset.
I tried being vegan for 3 months and it was very tiring to me often one of the the main things I was doing that day.
https://www.farmkind.giving/
In the housing argument they both miss that making housing more like a market could lead to more people living in NYC. Like, it isn't a completely fixed asset, housing can be more dense! And then more people get to benefit.
It isn't purely a quesiton of who gets to live in NYC it's about getting more housing to exist.
While I don't love Destiny's debate style, I think he makes a great point about reciprocation (here-ish). I need to believe that it's unsustainable to have one side that embages in good debate norms, and the other side that isn't willing to at all.
It at least makes sense not to be too upset over Kirk's death if Republicans won't do the same over Reiner's. Likewise while aethetically I don't like Gavin Newsom's posts. I think they serve as a balancing force to Trump's rhetoric.
Finally, I've long thought that it makes sense for democrats to gerrymander places if the Republicans are going to gerrymander.
Which leaves me sort of confused as my position here. I don't like destiny's crowing over the deaths of Trump supporters. But I find it hard to condemn in the face of the game theory of the situation if republicans often do similar things ( which I think they do).
It at least makes sense not to be too upset over Kirk’s death if Republicans won’t do the same over Reiner’s
Only one of these was a politically-motivated assassination.
Watch this video:
I think it's a pretty good set of mini debates. Good job EA Yale. I'd be interested to discuss the takes in the video with people who have watched at least the bit they are commenting on.
Write one comment per point your making.