RR views on "conceptual uplift stuff" aren't yet public, but they are currently working on writing up their thoughts about this. It is unclear to me whether this will then be made public, but it seems it will at least be available to in group people who ask to see it. -- bpomo's Shortform

AI is not doing the integrative reasoning that would find new connections and develop new insights, the kind of work where new techniques and new discoveries are made along the way that push the field forward -- Taylor G. Lunt on Richard Ngo's Shortform

My worst-case scenario related to conceptual reasoning is that capabilities related to such reasoning scale precisely along with the capabilities which we would rather avoid, like opaque/neuralese reasoning. How could one even evaluate such capabilities, let alone rule in or out my scenario?