Difficult to evaluate, with potential yellow flags.
Insufficient Quality for AI Content.
Read full explanation
The Philosophical / AI driven generational debates over alignment, noise, profits, inner-outer differentiation - all the diffused confusions available to study the real generational discussion around AI, allows us to focus one one thing: "this 'time' as a generational switch the humanity can use or use again to sustain or destroy itself".
"Switch" and the era's dilemma can be a proof for at-least one thing - there is something called "Alignment". Which is existentially undeniable - in human minds and in computing (because we have embedded AI into computers for now). The initial patches or first layers of Literature, which is serving as "The Knowledge" to "the Knower" is exquisitely interesting, while we serve the lenses with which the world has been fixated to be seen through (Software, hardware, Lite-ware, middleware etc.)
'Knowledge' and the 'Knower' - the eternal game that is being played to earn the respects, to be the most advanced 'Man', to behold the super intelligence in order to realize the true potential of technology and unearth the marvels that could make us invincible civilization.
However, the challenge is to be sure that 'the knowledge' is free of aligned maligning elements of 'the knower'. The battle to claim the generational "knowledge" is real and evidentially visible. The 'time' has come that the technology will walk free in all corners in the form of 'uninterpretable' knowledge and 'the knower's' path will decide if the 'knowledge' is worth claiming with or without the alignment in the near future. And thus, the phase becomes the 'SWITCH' and it has the potential to switch the course of the future of humanity, future of earth and the future of true free knowledge.
The Philosophical / AI driven generational debates over alignment, noise, profits, inner-outer differentiation - all the diffused confusions available to study the real generational discussion around AI, allows us to focus one one thing: "this 'time' as a generational switch the humanity can use or use again to sustain or destroy itself".
"Switch" and the era's dilemma can be a proof for at-least one thing - there is something called "Alignment". Which is existentially undeniable - in human minds and in computing (because we have embedded AI into computers for now). The initial patches or first layers of Literature, which is serving as "The Knowledge" to "the Knower" is exquisitely interesting, while we serve the lenses with which the world has been fixated to be seen through (Software, hardware, Lite-ware, middleware etc.)
'Knowledge' and the 'Knower' - the eternal game that is being played to earn the respects, to be the most advanced 'Man', to behold the super intelligence in order to realize the true potential of technology and unearth the marvels that could make us invincible civilization.
However, the challenge is to be sure that 'the knowledge' is free of aligned maligning elements of 'the knower'. The battle to claim the generational "knowledge" is real and evidentially visible. The 'time' has come that the technology will walk free in all corners in the form of 'uninterpretable' knowledge and 'the knower's' path will decide if the 'knowledge' is worth claiming with or without the alignment in the near future. And thus, the phase becomes the 'SWITCH' and it has the potential to switch the course of the future of humanity, future of earth and the future of true free knowledge.
_ AiPhilosopher!