Unless I am missing something, this post never actually says what a slip-box is or how to make and use one. What then am I supposed to do with the advice that "to start the habit of using slip-boxes" I should "start by making literature notes"? I can make some literature notes ... and what then? What do I do with them for them to be slip-box notes?
It seems like the single most important piece of information here is being wilfully withheld...
Apparently "slip box" is roughly equivalent to "card index" and Luhmann's system is as follows:
Obviously something very similar could be done on a computer, with many practical advantages over the version made out of pieces of paper.
I have a suspicion that Luhmann's alleged great productivity ("alleged" only because I haven't verified for myself) is best ascribed either (1) to things other than his use of a card-index system or (2) to idiosyncratic things about _how_ he used it that are not captured by what I wrote above or by the contents of the post here...
Re: Luhmann's productivity, see the list of published books (! not counting articles !): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niklas_Luhmann -- he was a prolific producer of texts.
You're right, all this can be done on a computer just fine. And you even get full-text search and such quality of life improvements.
The "key" to his productivity was not just doing all the steps you mention mindlessly for 30 years and voila, you have tons of books. Have you ever contributed to a wiki, e.g. at work? When you know 10 things but none of them are on the wiki, you create pages for them, add cross links, then find opportunities to add more details, explain the connections a bit -- you begin to work with the material, massage the existing pages, come up with new stuff in the process. Meanwhile, the rest of your life takes place, so you read, learn and hear about things outside of this hypothetical wiki, which may bring up more ideas to add to the existing knowledge base.
That's how working with a Zettelkasten is. The "key" is to create structures over time that can solidify knowledge and aid in attaching new ideas, discovering holes in your knowledge, and such things. To find out what Luhmann really did in practice, you may want to read his short "Communicating with Slip Boxes" article: http://luhmann.surge.sh/
I'm currently in the process of noticing how bad I am at note taking and wanting to get better at it. Not sure I'm going to use this system exactly but reading through it seems helpful for figuring out how I actually want to go about it.
I particularly suck at taking handwritten notes.
I'm unlikely to take up this method because it feels like a lot more process than I like, but I really appreciate reading content like this on LW about how other people do things.
Thanks for the great summary of the book. There are many software tools whose designers sought to implement the Zettelkasten method while taking care of many of the tedious and precarious details (like links) under the hood. In particular, the founder of the tool Roam Research cited How to Take Smart Notes and the Zettelkasten method as core sources of inspiration.
Source for a conversation (with a transcript written up in Roam, no less) where he stated this
Oh my god this is useful. The book is great make no mistake, but the core of the method is quite diluted and you have to get through a lot of selling the method to get to the core of it.
Loved your summary. I just finished Ahren's How to Take Smart Notes and you captured the heart of it. Thanks. I have questions regarding the "Links between notes." Your following explanation:
I think I am having trouble with the word "identifiers" and 'nested' structure. Perhaps these are mathematical terms and I'm not good at math. By identifiers, do you mean themes or topics or maybe reminders? Are they headings or titles?
How do you connect them to other notes? Do you peruse through your other notes in the slip box and add those "identifiers" to them? Would perusing those notes not take a lot of time to sift through?
The note taking book by Ahrens addresses this. Luhmann numbered the cards with 1, 2, 3, 4. These are the IDs. Each new card is sequentially added with the next number. Now if a card is closely related to card 1, then it can be given the ID 1a and added right after 1. The card following that can be 1b, 1c, 1d, etc. If you now need to add a card after 1c, that can have the ID 1c1. In this way you have a way of generating IDs for cards that are appended to the end, as well as for cards that are inserted in the middle of the pack somewhere. There references to a card is simply listing its ID. Once you have an ID you can look up the card in the slip box.
"Identifiers" would be more like addresses. A computer metaphor: if you have files, you can think of the path to the file as its identifier. Luhmann used an alphanumeric code (which I think is obsolete on the computer) but you can go with date-time stamps like 202002270807 for 2020-02-27 08:07 or similar. Or you use the title of the note. But then you cannot change the title anymore without breaking links, which makes it brittle.
Linking essentially works exactly as you described: leave the address in other notes in your archive.
This is an area where technology has made the original method obsolete.
In Obsidian (as I use it) one can add #tags, which are automatically indexed, and [[internal_doc_links]] which can be automatically updated on move / rename.
There's no longer any need to spend time thinking about how to organize this unique id system as though you needed to put a physical card into a linearly ordered physical pile.
Not doing so reduces the friction of taking notes. For me this is very powerful.
This is my rephrasing of (Ahrens, 2017, How to Take Smart Notes). I added some personal comments.
To be more productive, it's necessary to have a good system and workflow. The Getting Things Done system (collect everything that needs to be taken care of in one place and process it in a standardised way) doesn't work well for academic thinking and writing, because GTD requires clearly defined objectives, whereas in doing science and creative work, the objective is unclear until you've actually got there. It'd be pretty hard to "innovate on demand". Something that can be done on demand, in a predetermined schedule, must be uncreative.
Enter Niklas Luhmann. He was an insanely productive sociologist who did his work using the method of "slip-box" (in German, "Zettelkasten").
Making a slip-box is very simple, with many benefits. The slip-box will become a research partner who could "converse" with you, surprise you, lead you down surprising lines of thoughts. It would nudge you to (number in parenthesis denote the section in the book that talks about the item):
These are purely for remembering your thoughts. They can be: fleeting ideas, notes you would have written in the margin of a book, quotes you would have underlined in a book.
They have no value except as stepping stones towards making literature and permanent notes. They should be thrown away as soon as their contents have been transferred to literature/permanent notes (if worthy) or not (if unworthy).
Examples:
Jellyfish might be ethically vegan, since they have such a simple neural system, they probably can't feel pain.
Ch. 9 How to
attentionattend:
- One thing at a time. No multitasking
- When writing, attend to idea flow. Meaning, not wording. ...
These summarize the content of some text, and give the citation.
Example:
(Kahneman & Tversky, 1973) shows that people often do not take into account the prior when doing a Bayesian probability problem. In particular, when no evidence is given, the prior probabilities are used; when worthless evidence is given, prior probabilities are ignored.
Kahneman, Daniel, and Amos Tversky. “On the Psychology of Prediction.” Psychological Review (1973)
Such notes could be made in Zotero, which is how I do it. You might make them separately in some other notebook software, or just in plain text files.
Each permanent note contains one idea, explained fully, in complete sentences, as if part of a published paper.
There are many tools available for storing the permanent notes, see Tools • Zettelkasten Method. I personally recommend TiddlyWiki.
These are notes made only for a project, such as a note that collects all the notes that you'd want to assemble into a paper. They can be thrown away after the project is finished.
Don't just read. Make reading notes. Don't just learn. Make blog posts or something to share what you learned.
Also, hand-written notes has some advantage. In (Mueller & Oppenheimer, The Pen Is Mightier Than the Keyboard: Advantages of Longhand Over Laptop Note Taking, 2014), it's shown that students who take notes by laptop understood lectures less, due to their tendency to transcribe verbatim without understanding. From mouth to ears to fingers, bypassing the brains completely.
The way I see it, this is not an argument against using the computer, but an argument for repharsing instead of copy-pasting/direct quoting/mere transcribing.
Don't underline, highlight, write in the margins, or use several complicated systems for annotation. It'd make it really hard for you to retrieve these scattered ideas later. You would be forced to remember with your biological brain to keep track of what information is put where.
Put all these ideas in the same simple system of your slip-box, and you will be set free to use your biological brain to think about these ideas.
Your simple slip-box system would be like an external brain that interfaces seamlessly with your biological brain.
This is why advice on "how to write" in the form of a list of "do this then that" is bound to do badly.
Instead, you should write a lot of permanent notes in your slip-box. Then when the time comes for you to write a paper, just select a linear path out of the network of notes, then rephrase and polish that into a paper.
Calculate productivity not by how many pages of paper you've written, but by how many permanent notes you've written per day. This is because some pages of a paper can take months to write, others can take hours. In contrast, each permanent note takes roughly the same amount of time to write.
Feedback loops should be short. It makes you learn fast, fail fast, succeed fast. According to (Kahneman & Klein, Conditions for Intuitive Expertise: A Failure to Disagree, 2009), this is how intuitive expertise is made: a lot of practice in an environment with rapid and unambiguous feedback.
The traditional way of writing a paper takes months before you get a feedback in the form of reviewers' comments. Instead, you should make notes, which you could make several per day, allowing fast feedback loops. If you really understood something, you'd see it in the form of a well-written note. If not, then you know you haven't really understood it. You can experiment with other ways to make the notes and you will see immediately what works and what doesn't.
Don't multitask. Pay attention to one task at a time.
When writing, pay attention to the idea flow, what you want the words to mean. Don't pay attention to what the words actually mean.
When proofreading, pay attention to what the words are saying, and not what you think they mean.
Pay attention only to what you must and don't pay attention to anything else, because attention is very precious.
Routinize things that can be routinized, such as food, water, clothes... Wear only one outfit ever, like Steve Jobs. Eat only one meal plan, buy exactly the same kind of groceries, or better, always eat the first vegan meal plan at the canteen.
Use the Zeigarnik effect to your advantage. If you want something to stop intruding your mind, write it down and promise yourself that you'll "deal with it later". If you want to keep pondering something (perhaps a problem you want to solve), don't write it down, and go for a walk with that problem on your mind.
As mentioned before, each literature note contains exactly two parts: the content of a text, and the bibliographical location of the text. If you do the note in a bibliography software like Zotero, you can attach the note directly to the text, and there's no need for the bibliography information.
The most important thing is to capture your understanding of the text, so don't quote. Quoting can easily lead to out-of-context quoting. Preseve the context as much as possible by paraphrasing.
Prepare the literature notes so that when you make permanent notes, you can elaborate on the texts, that is, describe the context, find connections and contrasts and contradictions with other texts.
Recontexutalize ideas in your thought. Write down why you would care about an idea. For example (from section 11.2), if the idea is an observation from (Mullainathan and Shafir, 2013, Scarcity: Why having too little means so much):
people with almost no time or money sometimes do things that don’t seem to make any sense... People facing deadlines sometimes switch frantically between all kinds of tasks. People with little money sometimes spend it on seeming luxuries like take-away food.
Then
As someone with a sociological perspective on political questions and an interest in the project of a theory of society, my first note reads plainly:
Any comprehensive analysis of social inequality must include the cognitive effects of scarcity. Cf. Mullainathan and Shafir 2013.
There are three kinds of links between notes:
At the top level, there is one note called "Index". The index note is just a list of tags/keywords with links. Each tag/keyword is a topic that you care about, and is linked to a few notes (Luhmann limited himself to at most 2) that serve as "entry points" to the topic.
The entry points are often notes that give overviews to the topic. Luhmann would make these notes to be an annotated list of notes that cover various aspects of the topic. His entry-point notes would have list length up to 25.
Between notes, there are two kinds of links: sequential and horizontal. In fact, sequential links are really just horizontal links that you annotate as "sequential".
For example, consider this note:
Following: [link 1] [link 2]...
Content content [link 3] content content [link 4]...
Followed by: [link 5] [link 6] ...
After reading this note, you can go along the sequence and read "Followed by" notes, or take a sideways stride and follow the horizontal link [link 3].
The advantage of marking some links as sequential is that you get clear sequences of thought that you can easily follow, but they are by no means essential. You could just make horizontal links.
Ideally, you should make the network of slip-box notes to be like a small-world network, with a few notes having many connections, and some notes having "weak ties" to far-away notes (Granovetter, Mark S, 1977 The Strength of Weak Ties).
Don't brainstorm, since brainstormed ideas are what's easily available, instead of innovative or actually relevant. Especially don't group-brainstorm, which tend to become even less innovative due to groupthink effects (Mullen, Brian, Craig Johnson, and Eduardo Salas, 1991, Productivity Loss in Brainstorming Groups: A Meta-Analytic Integration).
Instead, do a walk through the slip-box and select a linear path. That gives you a draft from which you can polish into a paper.
Work on several papers simultaneously, switch if bored. This is a kind of "slow multitasking", which is good multitasking. Luhmann said
When I am stuck for one moment, I leave it and do something else... I always work on different manuscripts at the same time. With this method, to work on different things simultaneously, I never encounter any mental blockages.
When you need to cut out something that you really like, but just doesn't belong to the paper (such as something that is not relevant to the argument), you can make a file named "maybe later.txt" and dump all the things that you promise to add back later (but never actually do). This is a psychological trick that works.
Old habits die hard. The best way to break an old habit is to make a new habit that can hopefully replace the old habit.
For getting into the habit of using slip-boxes, you can start by making literature notes. Once you have that habit, making permanent notes would be a natural next habit to take on.