Your post on journalists is, as I suspected, a lot better.

I bounced off the post about mapping discussions because the post didn't make clear what potential it might have to be useful to me. The post on journalists, which drew me in and quickly made clear what its use would be: informing me of how journalists use conversations with them.

The implied claims that theory should be worth less than building or that time on task equals usefulness are both wrong. We are collectively very confused, so running around building stuff before getting less confused isn't always the best use of time.