The "History of Philosophy Without any Gaps" podcast (https://historyofphilosophy.net/) has for a while been alternating between weeks of Western and non-Western philosophy (which it does in a bit less detail, but still pretty in-depth). It's so far finished a series each on Indian and Africana philosophy and is currently starting on Ancient Chinese philosophy.

For those interested in Chinese philosophy, I'd suggest 韩非子 (Han Feizi), which offers a thoughtful meta-analysis of earlier philosophers like Laozi and contemporaries such as Xunzi, in so far as their thoughts applied to statecraft. (The first Emperor was a big fan of the work.). Note: Avoid the Burton Watson translation. 

This recommendation assumes some basic knowledge of Chinese history. 

For those new to the subject, [Recommendation to come, I am trying to find the English version for a children's book to Chinese Philosophy and History] might be a better starting point. -> No translation found. Will update if I run into anything better.

My recommendations are based on several key considerations:

• Quality of available translations
• Relevance to Western readers
• Focus on state-building as both an entry point and a way to understand how philosophy shaped Chinese governance
• Historical impact on actual governance

Chinese statebuilding is a very relevant lens because how early the Chinese started to concentrate executive power. The legalist school makes sense because the state was able to codify law staffed with court officers instead of relying on customary law enforced by local notables (thou the latter still happened a lot). And for Confucianism, for almost all of its existence, saw the best way to enact their worldly vision was through influencing the Emperor/King and their imperial/monarchial apparatus; Chinese philosophy is very much Chinese Political Philosophy. (Besides things like Xuanxue, ofc.)

While Mozi and Xunzi are often recommended here, I've found they might not be the most accessible entry points. Mozi, while interesting, had relatively limited historical influence compared to other schools of thought - being more well known to lay Chinese audience by his portrayals in historical dramas than his works. It would be somewhat like introducing Western philosophy through a lesser-known PreSocratic philosopher – potentially interesting but perhaps not the most representative starting point.

I've found that Chinese philosophy becomes more accessible when viewed through the lens of practical governance, as this provides concrete examples of how these ideas were implemented. Governance, being a universal concept, offers familiar ground for readers from any background and which ever cardinal direction. Additionally, many philosophical classics about governance have been reinterpreted over time, making them more approachable for modern readers.

TLDR: Chinese philosophy is firmly attached to Chinese history just like Western philosophy to the history of the Church. Gonna know both and let them bounce off each other.

You want Mèngzi [ -300s Chinese quasi-anti-Machiavellian ] [silly Latinization Mencius], Ibn Sina [ 900s Islamic Aristotelian who wrote on medicine ] [silly Latinization Avicenna], and the Nyaya and Vaiśeṣika schools [ 100-1000 Hindu analytic philosophy ] [if possible try the Praśastapāda [ c600 ]].

Edit: Also the linguist Pāṇini [ -600s - 300s linguist, from whom Chomsky's immediate predecessors pretty much cribbed the concept of a metalanguage wholesale; BNF was almost named "Pāṇini Backus Form" ].