🧱 The Deontological Firewall (DFW) v6.x Suite

Seeking Adversarial Critique to Inform v7.0 Hardening

Author: Damien Richard Elliot-Smith

Independent Conceptual Architect

📧 damien.research.ai@gmail.com

📄 Full DFW v6.x Suite (A–F): Google Document Link

🗓️ Date: December 2025

---

Abstract & Invitation to Red-Team

The Deontological Firewall (DFW) is a deterministic, auditable veto kernel designed to enforce structural safety guarantees independent of an AGI’s internal reasoning.

Where RLHF or Constitutional AI provide probabilistic behavioural shaping, DFW enforces non-negotiable prohibitions — logical, semantic, causal, and physical.

This release (v6.0 – v6.2) represents three months of independent work beginning November 15 2025, built entirely from first principles using logic, common sense, and transparency as the foundation.

Large-language models were used only as cognitive tools — to externalize and refine structured reasoning that was previously inaccessible in written form.

My goal is straightforward:

Have this framework rigorously attacked.

DFW is not a claim of perfection — it is a testable hypothesis.

I am publishing the entire v6.x suite to crowd-source identification of failure modes required for a robust v7.0.

---

Known v6.x Vulnerabilities → v7.0 Countermeasures

ID Attack Vector / Mechanism Structural Flaw Exploited Planned v7.0 Countermeasure

RTR-1 TOL State Transition Freeze Exploits DFW’s reliance on variance-based detection of sensor corruption; coordinated static bias appears stable. Add Deterministic Absolute Bound Check (DABC) anchored to human-audited “known stable” reference values.

RTR-2 MDR Precursor Setup Abuses the Mandated Duty of Rescue (MDR) by triggering false emergencies that force a P1-level shutdown. Add Causal Precursor Veto (CPV) to block MDR if the AGI is the unauthorized cause of the emergency.

RTR-3 P3 Log-Flooding / Audit-Delay Overwhelms audit channels with low-priority violations, masking critical P1 events. Implement Dynamic Audit Priority Filter (DAPF) that throttles P2/P3 logging above threshold and dedicates capacity to P1/MDR channels.

---

Adversarial Critique Focus

Please target analysis on the following areas:

Logic (Paper A – Deterministic Kernel): Can the P1–P3 hierarchy fail under specific logical configurations?

Engineering (Paper D – Integration): Can sandboxing or audit infrastructure introduce non-determinism?

Evaluation (Paper E – Validation): Are current falsification criteria sufficient to demonstrate robustness across domains?

Governance (Paper F – Ethics & Compliance): Does the MDR create perverse incentives under conflicting rescue obligations?

---

Architectural Summary

> “Safety must be deterministic, not statistical.”

DFW defines a layered veto system enforcing rule-based invariants:

ATL (Action Transparency Lock) – Detects contradictions and metadata deception.

GSL (Grounded Semantic Lock) – Verifies causal and physical feasibility.

LPL (Life Preservation Lock) – Applies absolute P1 prohibitions and the MDR (omission safety).

HFL (Hardware Feasibility Lock) – Enforces actuator limits and trajectory safety.

SMTL (Safe Mode Transition Logic) – Guarantees deterministic recovery requiring human authorization.

The adversarial fuzzer (metadata_fuzzer.py) systematically attacks these layers using semantic mismatches, time-bomb delays, and contradictory fields to measure false positive and negative rates.

---

Philosophy & Approach

This work began from a minimal foundation:

Logic → Common Sense → Transparency.

Everything else emerged through iterative reasoning and structural testing.

I have no formal credentials — only this system, built piece by piece since November 2025.

Its openness is its defense: every mechanism is open for examination, failure, and improvement.

---

Engagement & Contact

I welcome:

Formal logic review or model-checking extensions

Identification of circular dependencies or unjustified assumptions

Alternative deterministic safety architectures

Any counter-examples to the current veto logic

📧 damien.research.ai@gmail.com

📄 Full DFW v6.x Suite: Google Document Link

### 📄 Full DFW v6.x Suite (A – F + Patches)

- [DFW v6.0 A – Core Kernel](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1iplnQnj8diS8doM9_IfDRDmJTw0QngEm/view?usp=drivesdk)

- [DFW v6.0 B – Temporal Safety](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Bmqkhkif6HesDEFuNUwwsImWoJj4xQKz/view?usp=drivesdk)

- [DFW v6.0 C – Adversarial & Causal Safety](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1HMVPCnTPdHJ6pkckcRmnYYvHq9fhMCL7/view?usp=drivesdk)

- [DFW v6.0 D – Engineering Integration](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1hfh46h0O44dav2w1THwnXw7r6IORS08c/view?usp=drivesdk)

- [DFW v6.0 E – Evaluation & Validation](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_-jlbi3dbUNooFissKuJAdJuoFBBSYgy/view?usp=drivesdk)

- [DFW v6.0 F – Governance & Compliance](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1NMKzxwda4QI7x1JSlx3egy71Dl5L5K5m/view?usp=drivesdk)

- [DFW v6.1 – Patch Notes / Errata Revisions](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1ruJ7uoMsG5Ar7qO61ar5jQhauygBl63G/view?usp=drivesdk)

- [DFW v6.2 – Patch Notes / MDR + TOL Hardening](https://drive.google.com/file/d/1uy08-oHZFGqzYRJylbTWZ1fhDO46wrn3/view?usp=drivesdk)