This is a special post for quick takes by RobT. Only they can create top-level comments. Comments here also appear on the Quick Takes page and All Posts page.
Hi all,
I've built a working prototype of a system that lets multiple LLMs challenge, verify, and update each other's claims in real time—using lattice-based contradiction tracking, belief decay, and ripple propagation.
It's not ensemble voting. It’s a logic-based coherence layer—designed to catch hallucinations, trace inference decay, and build transparent reasoning structures across agents.
Before I take this further, I need a sharp, independent technical mind to review the architecture under NDA. No hype, no promises—just real feedback on whether this thing holds water.
DM if interested. You'll be signing up to stress-test something I believe could form the backbone of how AI systems arbitrate truth.
... you're asking people to invest a bunch of their own time and sign an NDA. You can obviously do what you want, but I think it would be courteous to check that your claims survive at least some contact with reality.
You definitely don't need to @256, @7 would suffice for MATH or GSM8K. That said, GSM8K is a benchmark, not a single test. So that's 7 samples times 1319 rows to get performance numbers. You would need to automate your math, but you need to do that anyway if you want to get a big enough sample size not to fool yourself (n=30 is just not enough... (read more)