Most of the people I grew up with were “religious.” They called themselves followers of their parents’ religion out of a sense of cultural belonging or duty, but not quite because they followed a doctrine of deeply held beliefs.
I don’t think faith is a bad thing. I also think most physicalists characterize their belief systems by what they don’t believe in: maybe they don’t believe in a god, or heaven, or reincarnation, etc.
I haven’t found a belief system that is as broad as a typical religion, while still being as grounded in physical reality and technology (even future technology) as physicalism. The closest things we have are transhumanism or e/acc, but they still feel more like hope in something that isn’t eternal or transcendental. Put differently, physicalism doesn’t quite have an eschatology or soteriology strong enough to make it a comprehensive belief system.
Physicalism by definition boxes itself out of transcendental ideas and hopes. I think that’s a bad thing, because there’s a way that these things do fit.
Let’s start with salvation, because it’s one of the most “woo-woo” ideas from religion that physicalism doesn’t have a replacement for.
Abrahamic versions tend to come down to: “if you believe, good things will happen.” Eastern versions tend to come down to: “if you do your duty, good things will happen.” What do I need to do, under physicalism, for good things to happen to me - and for them to keep happening even after my body passes away?
(Note: if I’m a scholar in anything, it’s in the nuances different cultures bring to their ideas of the afterlife. I know the above is very lossy.)
What does a physicalist heaven, made of bytes and atoms, look like? I think we need to take a few steps to get there. And I think we’ll get there in my lifetime.
In short: even in a physicalist universe, we are all saved.