1544

LESSWRONG
LW

1543
PracticalRationality
Frontpage

31

Mark Manson and Evidence-Based Personal Development

by Chris_Leong
23rd Nov 2020
1 min read
3

31

PracticalRationality
Frontpage

31

Mark Manson and Evidence-Based Personal Development
2ChristianKl
2aarongertler
1adamShimi
New Comment
3 comments, sorted by
top scoring
Click to highlight new comments since: Today at 4:05 PM
[-]ChristianKl5y20

It's worth noting that Mark Manson is influencial for what other bloggers in the personal development field do (the German bloggers I know personally consider him a good role model). 

Reply
[-]aarongertler5y20

Here's a link to Manson's announcement. Always good to see more people trying to swim up toward the sanity waterline.

Reply
[-]adamShimi5y10

Yep, I saw that pretty recently. I love Mark Manson's work, and I'm not surprised he's trying to improve the quality of information on the internet. I also recommend his newsletter, which contains some great writing and ideas too.

Reply
Moderation Log
More from Chris_Leong
View more
Curated and popular this week
3Comments

Most personal development is notoriously unreliable.

Mark Manson, a popular personal development author, is making an effort to make his advice more scientific. To this end, he has started labelling his blog posts based on their evidence base. He writes that he has: "put together a team of Psychologists with MSc’s and PhD’s to help me research, outline and fact-check the content here on the site". He divides his blog posts into four categories:

  • Evidence-based: for posts that recommend actions based on academic research, where it has been checked that studies have replicated and have decent sample sizes, ect.
  • Fact-checked: for posts that have been fact checked and are descriptive (he only uses evidence-based to describe posts that recommend actions)
  • Theory: Rooted in academic theories that might be highly theoretical or not yet confirmed
  • Opinion: Articles based purely off his own personal opinion

Anyway, just thought that I'd mention this here, because it's great to see an example of a popular author shifting more this direction and adopting their own (less nerdy) version of epistemic statuses.