This brings to mind a post, On Stance, by Screwtape, and my comment relating the mental stances I use to remind myself in the moment of how my brain consistently fails. In the past few years I have been trying to take this more seriously. Especially as I’ve become more aware of how my inattentive ADHD makes certain things difficult.
I’m coming up on my first full year of journaling, I’ve been doing that for about 1.5 years now, but I’m a little proud/excited to finish out 2025 with a journal entry for every day. I’m 47, and I really wish I had started earlier. Not only does this help me with analysis and memory augmentation now, but as I get older and really start experiencing mental decline I hope it will help me reconnect with who I used to be. Maybe once I’m dead it’ll help my son connect with me too.
It sounds like you’re coming to some of the same realizations as I have. “Is this true?” is a great general-purpose mental stance. “Later is a lie,” is how I remind myself that I’m not likely to remember something in the future. While we can’t do much about the underlying problems, we can create systems to compensate, and mitigate our failures.
…if it's anything like mine[1]. If it isn't, then maybe treat this as an opportunity to fight the typical mind fallacy by getting a glimpse at what's going on in other minds.
I've made many predictions and have gone through a lot of calibration training over the years, and have generally become pretty well calibrated in several domains. Yet I noticed that in some areas, I seem surprisingly immune to calibration. Where my brain just doesn't want to learn that it's systematically and repeatedly wrong about something. This post is about the three four such areas.
Sometimes, I feel incredibly confident that some piece of information will be easy for me to recall in the future, even when this is entirely false. Some examples:
Even knowing these patterns, it's often surprisingly difficult to override that feeling of utter conviction that "this case is different", assuming that this time I'll really remember that thing easily.
When I'm in an unusually comfortable situation but need to leave it soon, I often feel a deep, visceral sense of this being in some sense unbearable. Like the current comfort being so much better than whatever awaits afterwards, that it takes a huge amount of activation energy to get moving. And almost every time, within seconds after finally leaving that situation, I realize it's far less bad than I imagined.
Two examples:
Somewhat related may be my experience of procrastination and overestimating how unpleasant it would be to engage with certain aversive tasks. This almost always ends up being a huge overestimate, and the thing I procrastinated for ages turns out to be basically fine. My System 1 is pretty slow to update on this, though.
I'm generally quite conflict-avoidant. But not everyone is - some people are pretty blunt, and when something I did or said seems objectionable to them, they don't pull punches. I suppose that becoming irrational in the face of blame is not too unusual, and it's easy to imagine the evolutionary benefits of such an adaptation. Still, it's interesting to observe how, when under serious attack, my brain becomes particularly convinced that I must be entirely innocent and that this attack on me is outrageously unjust.
After reading Solve for Happy by Mo Gawdat, I didn't take that much away from the book - but one thing that did stick with me is the simple advice of asking yourself "is this true?" when you're reflecting on some narrative that you're constructing in your head during a conflict. Not "does this feel true?" - it basically always does - but whether my internal narrative is actually a decent representation of reality, and quite often it isn't, and even just asking this question then makes it much easier to step out of this one-sided framing.
One of the most common things to happen to me in dreams is that I realize that some particular situation is very strange. I then tend to think something like "Wow, typically, this kind of thing only happens to me in dreams. It's very interesting that this time it's happening for real". I've had this train of thought hundreds of times over the years. Sometimes I think this while awake, and then immediately do a reality check. In a dream, however, I'm so gullible that I almost never make this jump to ask myself, "wait a second, is this a dream?" - I just briefly think how curious it is that I'm now experiencing a dream-like weirdness for real, and don't act on it at all, because I'm so convinced that I'm awake that I don't even bother to check. Eventually, I wake up and facepalm.
Through calibration training, I learned that I can train my System 1 to make pretty accurate predictions by refining the translation of my inner feeling of conviction into probabilities. The areas mentioned in this post are deviations from that - contexts where, even with considerable effort, I haven't yet managed to entirely overcome the systematically wrong predictions/assessments that my intuition keeps throwing at me. Subjectively, they often feel so overwhelmingly true that it's difficult to resist the urge to just believe my intuition. Having this meta-awareness about it certainly helps somewhat. Indeed, as in the "Is this true?" example, sometimes it's mostly about asking the right question in the right moment. Like learning to respond to my brain's claim that "clearly, I'll easily remember this thing in the future" with "wait, will I?" instead of just going along with it - at which point I typically know that I should be suspicious.
My impression is that the more I think about this and discuss it with others, the better I get at recognizing such situations when they happen, even if progress on this is annoyingly slow. So, uhh, perhaps reading about it is similarly helpful.
I made a very informal survey among some friends, and it seemed like ~80% of them could relate to what I describe at least to some degree.