I understand this point of view and have considered it, but I don't believe its quite right. For example, if i think about it only as my love and my revenge for my loved one, yes this makes sense, but i believe there is a bigger picture.
Lets change the scenario. Lets now say that I am the one that has been wronged and someone who loves me wants to avenge me do violence for me. Do I want them to? If I love them, many times, I would not want them to do violence and avenge me, because that would put them at risk and prolong their suffering. In violence terms I would think, "what if my loved one gets hurt?" "What if what happened to me happens to them?" "What if their life becomes worse because they did violence for me?". If this violence and/or revenge would not benefit me in a great way (and even if it did really), its not worth putting my loved ones through this even if they want to because of their love for me. In this situation, I would ask that if they really love me, they make the effort to not go for that violence and revenge and instead focus on keeping themselves safe. This would be hard for them and would be an even bigger act of love if they manage to do it.
So taking this into account, it's not that simple. Many times, true love is being willing to NOT do violence and let go, and what the person you loved would've wanted. Sure, many would not love and do neither, some would love and go for violence and revenge, but i believe many would also love and be even stronger and not go for violence and revenge.
I think in that story, the love was tied to violence and saved winkie from death because there was the added factor of power. The soldiers would be many and would have power to achieve the revenge without mayor negative consequences. Most people would end up worse of after a revenge. Unlike the soldiers, even if they, for example, killed the one who killed their loved one, their lives would be destroyed and may have to die themselves.
Maybe people avoid looking at that because realizing they aren’t in love with their partner would be very inconvenient.
This definitely happened for me. I wasted so much time in relationships that were not valuable to me. Thanks for writing it so crisply.
In Rudyard Kipling’s “Wee Willie Winkie,” Winkie is a six-year-old British boy and the son of a Colonel posted in colonial India. His highest ideal to become an honorable man. He strives to be just, prudent, and loyal, in the ways a six-year-old believes these things can exist as true, real things. Not as means for some other end, but as ends in themselves. He lives with his whole heart, and he has a six-year-old’s lisp, and it’s easy to fall in love with him in just a couple thousand words.
By promising to keep a soldier’s engagement secret, he finds himself with a feeling of responsibility for that soldier’s betrothed. In the climax he sees her foibleing into danger, and rushes after her to help. By the time he catches up to her they are deep in enemy territory, and soon surrounded by one of the clans that are unhappy with the British presence. They’re about to be kidnapped and likely killed.
Winkie orders the raiders to bring word to the British outpost that they need help, and promises them they’ll be rewarded. The raiders laugh at first, until one of them recognizes the boy.
“He is the heart’s heart of those white troops. For the sake of peace let them go both, for if he be taken, the regiment will break loose and gut the valley. Our villages are in the valley, and we shall not escape. That regiment are devils. They broke Khoda Yar’s breast-bone with kicks when he tried to take the rifles; and if we touch this child they will fire and rape and plunder for a month, till nothing remains. Better to send a man back to take the message and get a reward. I say that this child is their God, and that they will spare none of us, nor our women, if we harm him.”
Canonically, Harry Potter was protected from the Killing Curse because his mother loved him so darn much. It’s a common fantasy trope, to the point of being a cliche. I read another protected-by-love and I roll my eyes. Usually.
Here, however, a helpless boy is protected by the power of the love of the local regiment of soldiers. The threat of them boiling over in murderous vengeance is a shield more effective than a dozen rifles and a cannon. The soldiers have created the real magic that these wish-fulfillment fantasy stories dream of. With their love. And the raiders know this, because they also understand love.
The power of love is that you don’t have to make any threat, it is inherent in the display of love. Those who are being deterred don’t need to judge how serious you are or what other political or practical considerations may sway you, they only need to be aware of the depth of your love. The Afghan raiders in Wee Willie Winkie don’t need to weigh the political situation of the British outpost and how retaliation will affect their strategic position in the wider area. They just need to know that the soldiers there absolutely adore Winkie and will rage like a thousand suns if he’s killed, all other consequences be damned. This is the shield that protects the boy.
In the modern world this is unacceptable. To say that I feel it’s good that these soldiers would raze an entire valley if their Winkie was killed is borderline psychopathic. But my heart feels this is good anyway. I don’t think you can have love without this drive to smash egregious violence into the bodies of anyone who would kill your loved one.1 I don’t think it’s good to pretend otherwise. Recognizing that you would hesitate to go on a vengeance rampage is a sign that you aren’t truly in love with the person you’re with. Maybe people avoid looking at that because realizing they aren’t in love with their partner would be very inconvenient.
In fact by strangling this desire in ourselves and burying it deep inside, we may be damaging our ability to feel true love at all. When your body isn’t allowed to feel this drive to do violence for the memory of your loved one, it doubts you love that person at all. Instead of love you get a warmed-over Liking. Maybe you even Like Like someone. But love? You can’t isolate the love from the willingness to do violence. They come as a pair.