There's a trade-off to be wary of here in trying to improve the list only by adding. Making it complete might also make it too long to actually get much use.
Can you optimize the list to keep the most valuable bits while also keeping it nice and short to increase the chance someone will go through the effort of answering the questions?
I noticed in your own use of the template, you only included a few of the sub-questions.
I added in a few more of the questions from the template that seem relevant. Including the one about possible difficulties. I think what's there cover's your trade-off.
I was thinking that the template would be something where you could just keep the sections that seem relevant and delete the rest.
But I guess even that would start to get annoying if the thing was super long. That's a good consideration to keep in mind.
A suggested improvement to the template: When examining the status quo, also ask "for what related problems does the status quo have a built-in solution?".
You have spelled "stakeholders" as "steak-holders", which is charming but may reduce credibility in some circumstances.
The template might benefit from a section asking what preconceptions or stereotypes surround the topic. When I think back to times I've tried to improve things, I recall some being stymied by a group of people having a social memory of a time that something related was tried and went horribly wrong, or a time that some other group tried a similar thing and it backfired, or other expectations of negative outcomes.
The other question to consider adding, possibly adjacent to "what has been tried already", is along the lines of "why am I unwilling to tolerate this status quo when everyone else experiencing it does tolerate it?". I don't think this is the best phrasing, but comparing one's experience with something intolerable to the experiences of those who find it tolerable can often reveal techniques for making the experience tolerable, which shifts the value proposition of eliminating the experience.
What resources might help in improving this template?
Science of decision-making may be interesting, as it tends to be predicated on the assumption that decisions need to pick or create the "best" option, aka an improvement.
I added "Given these problems, why are people still tolerating the status quo (if they are)?" to the template. Does that capture your idea well enough?
You have spelled "stakeholders" as "steak-holders", which is charming but may reduce credibility in some circumstances.
Heh. Funny mistake. Thanks.
A suggested improvement to the template: When examining the status quo, also ask "for what related problems does the status quo have a built-in solution?".
I want to make sure I understand your point here. Is the idea that sometimes we see that a system isn't solving some problem well enough, and so try to fix it. But we don't take into account the fact that the system isn't just trying to solve that problem, but ...
I'm trying to come up with a template for questions of the form "How should we improve X?" I assume most such questions will involve answering many subquestions. Sometimes the answers to those subquestions will be implied in the context, or the questions may not all be relevant. But my guess is that the larger and more complicated the system is that would be improved, the more you'd want to explicitly answer these subquestions.
There are many ways you may be able to help me. This question is a bit meta, in the sense that I'm trying to improve something (the template). Here are the questions from the template that seem relevant here. Feel free to contribute to any of these:
Here's the template so far:
I'd like to have a template that could be used to start new question pages that have the form "How should we improve X?"
The template should be applicable across a wide range of progress type questions.
The template should feel useful to people asking these sorts of questions.
We shouldn't aim to cover every single possible question that could be relevant to the top level question. That would be too overwhelming.
Process Improvement Theory and Application (maybe this is relevant?)
reddit? what subreddits might be able to help?
I guess anyone who wants to test the thing can try to use the template and give feedback on if it was helpful or not.
It will be a tough balance to strike to have a template that's sufficiently general such that it applies to many situations, but at the same time has enough detail to have some marginal value over just asking the question without the template.
RFC's seem to have a similar structure to "how do we improve X" type questions.
Process Improvement theory may be close enough to be relevant.
[from nim]: "Science of decision-making may be interesting, as it tends to be predicated on the assumption that decisions need to pick or create the "best" option, aka an improvement."