This is a linkpost - I recommend reading it at the original URL for a better reading UX
I have a somewhat elaborate process for reading things that I find on the web. I've been inspired to share it because after many a long iteration it finally feels adequate!
Reading things on the web seems like it should be easy, and yet - I've been failing at it for years! 🙀
In this article I explore my current workflow and challenges that made it into what it is today.
Workflow
- When I see something new I want to read - save it to Readwise Reader (it also becomes an SRS item in Roam)
- When in "podcast mode" (doing house chores, biking, etc) - queue up a TTS version of an article.
- Each day after lunch - read one or more pieces suggested by Spaced Repetition in Roam - reschedule others
- Highlights and notes are synced into Roam and selectively become SRS items
The goal of the workflow is to: Enable you to reliably read things you want to read (and retain learnings from it) while minimizing effort and attention spent.
Discovery
This is part of the pipeline that received relatively less optimization attention, mostly by virtue of me suffering from abundance of content rather than scarcity. I include it primarily for completeness’ sake.
Some ways in which discovery is happening for me are as follows:
- Follow-up from previous things I read
- people often link related content
- Ampie extension is helpful to discover the broader conversation about a given piece - which includes links to related content
- Recommendations from friends - sent directly or via social media
- Aggregator newsletters (Indie Hackers, https://rationalnewsletter.com/)
- I like aggregator newsletters because they introduce an additional layer of curation over raw subscription streams like RSS.
- I'm also subscribed to a few "normal" newsletters
I'd love to see a Goodreads-style platform created for discovering and tracking articles.
- Ampie gives me some of the same benefits, but less systematically
- Curius.app is a more social version of Hypothes.is and also covers some of the similar ground
Reading Inbox
When I encounter something that I think would be worth my attention - I save it to Readwise Reader
- This also serves as a trigger to create an SRS item in Roam
The first problem of reading things on the internet is that there are too many things out there one is tempted to read.
Even if you have a good curation process there is always too much content and too little time.
My first approach to managing the reading inbox was to keep things I want to read in endless browser tabs and breathe a sigh of relief when my browser crashed and all the open tabs disappeared
When I noticed that this process didn't actually achieve the goal of helping me to read things I wanted to read - I started pushing myself to add things to Pocket/Instapaper to have a clear backlog of things to read
- Which put me in a situation when I had hundreds of articles in Instapaper instead of as persistently open tabs (somehow that only marginally impacted number of open tabs I had 😅)
The result wasn't amazing - I went from not reading things and having them eating into my attention to not reading them and forgetting about them.
Arguably it was an improvement, as attention is an important and scarce resource, but as the point of this workflow is to help me actually read things instead of collecting the things I wish I have read - it was a failure.
A better way to direct my limited attention was called for! And I found it in Spaced Repetition
Spaced Repetition in Roam
When a piece is added to Readwise Reader - a Roam "block" for it is automatically created
- It's tagged with to/read and configured to become an SRS Card
The core pillar of directing my attention programmatically is Spaced Repetition - I use it extensively for inbox processing, engaging with content over time and developing habits.
How does this work:
- When the item is originally added to Roam - it's scheduled for a review in one of the next few days
- During my daily reading time, I review each suggested item. If I want to read it, I do so right then. Otherwise, I either:
- I reschedule it further into the future
- Or mark it as "done" if I'm not interested in the piece anymore
It proved to be a good match for reading inbox handling. The above process has the effect of:
- keeping the things I want to read salient
- sorting them by excitement - things that I'm repeatedly not excited to read end up scheduled exponentially further in the future
Listen to content in audio form first
For any new piece of content I want to engage with - listen to an audio version of it first
- This is often sufficient to get what I was hoping for from a piece ✅
- If not - it serves as a first-pass skim read before deeper engagement
This is one of the core pillars of my reading flow — I think reading things in audio form is underappreciated.
Audio form dramatically extends the range of environments and situations when it's convenient for you to read.
- I listen to audiobooks, podcasts and TTS version of articles when I bike to places, do chores and sometimes even while taking a shower (though I've been avoiding the latter lately).
- This allows me to read more - in fact it increases my reading throughput to a degree that I can first-pass read things faster than I find new things to read!
Read it once mindset
An important stepping stone to make audio form work well for me was overcoming “only read a given thing once” mindset.
What I mean by that is that when I originally started using TTS to read things - after listening to an article - I felt like "I read this, I'm done with it an and don't need to engage with it anymore".
- I was doing a kind of symbolic representation of reading
And while it's actually true for many types of content (opinion pieces, news articles, fiction) - I found it that for deeper, more technical pieces - just listening to something once, often wasn't quite satisfactory. I wanted to highlight paragraphs, add notes, play with presented models.
As a consequence I was avoiding listening to all content as I had a vague sense of unease "but what if it's a piece I want to engage deeper with and by listening to it, I'd lose an opportunity to derive full benefit from it".
Eventually I realized that it was silly 🙃
My new process is:
- listen to all the content that comes my way first
- this is sufficient level of engagement for a large chunk of what I want to read
- for things that need deeper engagement
- put them on top of the queue of the to-read things
- read them again (likely in text form this time), highlight and annotate them, play with models they present, find follow-up reading
Spaced Repetition reminds me to engage with the piece until I mark it as fully processed
I've been previously using a custom automation setup that allowed me to create a podcast feed of transcribed articles from things saved to Instapaper (https://github.com/Stvad/pollycast/ ).
I've since transitioned to mostly using Readwise Reader TTS.
The reason for having custom setup was a better UX for playing audio inside the podcast apps and a better voice quality. Reader TTS got both of those things to a "good enough" stage.
In-depth reading
For items that survived this far in the pipeline - I'll read them at a designated reading time (usually)
I do most of my reading on an iPad and use Readwise Reader or Hypothes.is for annotation purposes.
Highlights and notes sync to Readwise, then to Roam. The next day I review them in Roam, converting notes that I want to engage with more into SRS items for ongoing review.
Support structures
Some things that I found helpful to make focused reading something that I do reliably and in a productive way
Incorporate “focused reading time” to be a stable part of my daily routine
- I devote 30+ focused minutes to reading every day after lunch.
Getting an iPad and using it as my primary reading device
- Having a dedicated device with good reading UX affordances elevates the overall experience considerably.
- I've primarily used a phone or a laptop prior to getting a tablet, but both provide a subpar experience for reading.
- I've also had a Kindle for a while, but I found it frustrating to use for web and PDF content and so it mostly languished in my drawer.
- Physical books have nice aesthetics, but overall unsatisfactory UX, so reading a print book is something that I'd do occasionally, but it requires additional effort/accommodation for the sake of the experience.
Beeminder was very useful as a way to introduce daily reading habit
- But when I relied just on Beeminder - it was an "effortful" habit. What I mean by that is - I'd do it because I committed to it, but it wasn't part of a routine, which constantly made me scramble to fulfill Beeminder requirements last moment.
- Making it into a predictable routine is what made it “effortless”, Beeminder has applied optimization pressure to help me get there though.
Things I'm still unhappy about
Taking notes alongside reading
- I have a keyboard case for the iPad, but I read things in portrait mode and it's annoying to get it in and out of the case each time I want to take a note.
- Plausibly I should just have an external keyboard on-hand
- Handwriting sucks
- voice keyboards are meh
- Audio notes are created out of context and I need to manually tie them to the original piece later
Having the SRS around what should I read to be in an external app (Roam) is a bit awkward
- The two places are disconnected after the original SRS item creation, and so I need to mark any given article as read twice - once in SRS system and once in Reader.
- Ideally a domain-specific SRS implementation would be a part of the reading app experience.
- Generally - incorporating learnings from this WF into one tool would be great.
- Readwise Reader is getting there, but still has ways to go before it'd be an ideal reading app for me.
- I make due by building automations and tweaks around the core experience. But the degree to which I can do that is limited and makes me wish once again for a world with more malleable software
Conclusion
Overall I'm finally happy with this workflow, which prompts me to share it 🙂.
I imagine some of its aspects are peculiar to how I interact with the information out there. But I hope that people can adopt chunks of the workflow that work well for their peculiarities. And that if you recognize some of the struggles I went through in yourself - you may find my solutions useful.
If you do give it a try or if you have your own peculiar ways of interacting with the information you find on the internet - I'd be curious to know
Misc
More things I do or have tried around reading
Display highlights & notes on the page when I visit it at a later point
When I revisit a web page that I've previously read - I want to be able to see how I have interacted with it - see highlights I've made, notes I've taken etc.
There are several tools that afford for that, but I haven't found a perfect solution so far.
- Readwise Reader has a browser extension that allows you to save things to read later and annotate the web-page in-place
- It'd then display the highlights and notes when you visit the page later. Unfortunately it'd only be the annotations taken within the reader.
- I hope that eventually they'll have a better integration with "Readwise 1.0" which is what I use to manage all my highlights from different sources.
- Hyphothes.is
- Inherently displayed as part of original page. But you have to remember to trigger it to see the annotations.
- Only highlights made in Hypothes.is are displayed.
- Promnesia
- Browser extension to augment your browsing experience with additional context
- Theoretically this can support annotations from arbitrary sources, in practice it currently only pulls in highlights from an Instapaper export data.
Failed experiments
I experimented with improving iPad web annotation UX
spritz speed reading
- I was interested in reading using Spritz/RSVP (at least for the first pass)
- It's currently redundant though, as audio serves the role of "first pass/quick skim".
- And if the piece needs a second pass - I want to engage with it deeper.
Copying things into Roam and reading them there
- The idea was to use Roam's linking facilities for a deeper engagement with the piece. Roam is not a great environment to read in though, and copying fidelity is subpar.