This is a special post for quick takes by DragonGod. Only they can create top-level comments. Comments here also appear on the Quick Takes page and All Posts page.
I will state below what I call the "strong anti consciousness maximalism" position:
Because human values are such a tiny portion of value space (a complex, fragile and precious thing), "almost all" possible minds would have values that I consider repugnant:
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Almost_all
A simple demonstration: for every real number, there is a mind that seeks to write a representation of that number to as many digits as possible.
Such minds are "paperclip maximisers" (they value something just a banal as paperclips). There are an uncountable (as many as there are real numbers) number of such minds.
I would oppose the creation of such minds and should they exist will support disempowering them.
Thus, I oppose "almost all" possible conscious minds.
In the infinitude of mindspace, only a finite subset are "precious".
Quantification is hard, and I can understand changing your position on "most" vs "almost all". But the underlying realizations that there are at least "some" places in mindspace that you oppose strongly enough to prevent creation and attempt destruction of such minds remains valuable.