Ruby | v1.4.0Oct 2nd 2020 | (+6513/-127) | ||
brook | v1.3.0Aug 10th 2020 | (-11) | ||
brook | v1.2.0Aug 10th 2020 | (+1628/-611) | ||
brook | v1.1.0Aug 9th 2020 | (+969/-6488) | ||
v0.0.23Jan 2nd 2013 | got rid of extra line break | |||
Grognor | v0.0.22Mar 10th 2012 | (+54/-2) free book woohoo | ||
Zack_M_Davis | v0.0.21Feb 28th 2012 | (+7) | ||
Frost Shock Level 4 | v0.0.20Dec 11th 2009 | (+16/-24) reword | ||
Vladimir_Nesov | v0.0.19Dec 7th 2009 | (+67/-89) Undo revision 5602 by Frost Shock Level 4. I don't understand your objection. No one implied evolution produced the first replicator, and humans are an important special case! | ||
Frost Shock Level 4 | v0.0.18Dec 7th 2009 | (+89/-67) I don't understand "humans in particular", and it did not produce the first replicator |
See also: Biology, Evolutionary Psychology, Game Theory
1. Many issues pertinentFirstly, evolution is a useful case study of humans' ability (or inability) to model the real world. This is because it has a single clear criterion ("relative reproductive fitness") which is selected (optimized) for:
"If we can't see clearly the result of a single monotone optimization criterion—if we can't even train ourselves to hear a single pure note—then how will we listen to an orchestra? How will we see that "Always be selfish" or "Always obey the government" are poor guiding principles for human beings to adopt—if we think that even optimizing genes for inclusive fitness will yield organisms which sacrifice reproductive opportunities in the name of social resource conservation?
To train ourselves to see clearly, we need simple practice cases"
-- Eliezer Yudkowsky, Fake Optimisation Criteria
Secondly, much of rationality seem to have their rootsnecessarily revolves around the human brain (fornow). An understanding of how it came into being can be very helpful both for understanding 'bugs' in evolutionary psychology. For example, why do so many people statethe system (like superstimuli), and for explaining Complexity of Value, among others.
A candy bar is a superstimulus: it contains more concentrated sugar, salt, and fat than anything thatthey wish to alleviate suffering equally among all people, and then donate money to charities supporting people with conditions they have, rather than highly-effective suffering reducers?
As Eliezer would have it, "Politicswas a feature ofexists in the ancestral environment.We are descended fromA candy bar matches taste buds that evolved in a hunter-gatherer environment, but it matches thosewho argued most persuasivelytaste buds much more strongly than anything that actually existed in thegood of the tribe meant executing their hated rival Uglak. (We sure ainhunter-gatherer environment. The signal that once reliably correlated to healthy food has been hijacked, blotted out with a point in tastespace that wasn'tdescended from Uglak.)"
2. Illustrates many common errorsinthinking about complex problems, such as seeing agency in non-agent systemsthe training dataset - an impossibly distant outlier on the old ancestral graphs.
-- Eliezer Yudkowsky, Superstimuli and the Collapse of Western Civilisation
[WIP]
Evolution is "change in the heritable characteristics of biological populations over successive generations" (Wikipedia). For posts about machine learning look here.
See also: Biology, Evolutionary Psychology, Game Theory
The brainless, mindless optimization process responsible for the production of all biological life on Earth, including human beings. Since the design signature of evolution is alien and counterintuitive, it takes some study to get to know your accidental Creator.
__TOC__
1. Many issues pertinent to rationality seem to have their roots in evolutionary psychology. For example, why do so many people state that they wish to alleviate suffering equally among all people, and then donate money to charities supporting people with conditions they have, rather than highly-effective suffering reducers?
As Eliezer would have it, "Politics was a feature of the first replicator was not how amazingly well it replicated, butancestral environment. We are descended from those who argued most persuasively that a first replicator could arise, at all, by pure accident, in the primordial seas of Earth. That first replicator would undoubtedly be devoured in an instant by a sophisticated modern bacterium. Likewise, the wonder of evolution itself is not how well it works, but that a brainless, accidentally occurringoptimization process can work at all. If you praise evolution for being such a wonderfully intelligent Creator, you're entirely missing the wonderful thing about it.
The brainless, mindless optimization process responsible for the production of all biological life on Earth, andincluding human beings in particular.beings. Since the design signature of evolution is alien and counterintuitive, it takes some study to get to know your accidental Creator.
The brainless, mindless optimization process, which began on Earth when responsible for the first replicator arose by chance, from which it producedproduction of all biological life on Earth.Earth, and human beings in particular. Since the design signature of evolution is alien and counterintuitive, it takes some study to get to know your accidental Creator.
The brainless, mindless optimization process responsible for, which began on Earth when the production offirst replicator arose by chance, from which it produced all biological life on Earth, and human beings in particular.Earth. Since the design signature of evolution is alien and counterintuitive, it takes some study to get to know your accidental Creator.
Evolution is
""change in the heritable characteristics of biological populations over successive generations"" (Wikipedia). For posts about machine learning look here.See also:Related: Biology, Evolutionary Psychology,Why
Evolution?be interested in evolution?Firstly, evolution is a useful case study of
humans'humans' ability (or inability) to model the real world. This is because it has a single clear criterion("("relative reproductivefitness"fitness") which is selected (optimized) for:--cases" -- Eliezer Yudkowsky, Fake Optimisation CriteriaSecondly, much of rationality necessarily revolves around the human brain (for now). An understanding of how it came into being can be very helpful both for understanding
'bugs''bugs' in the system (like superstimuli), and for explaining Complexity of Value, among others.-- Eliezer Yudkowsky, Superstimuli and the Collapse of Western Civilisation
See also
External links
Summaries of Sequence's Posts on Evolution
The following are summaries of posts concerning evolution in the Eliezer's sequences:
- An Alien God - Evolution is awesomely powerful, unbelievably stupid, incredibly slow, monomaniacally singleminded, irrevocably splintered in focus, blindly shortsighted, and itself a completely accidental process. If evolution were a god, it would not be Jehovah, but H. P. Lovecraft's Azathoth, the blind idiot God burbling chaotically at the center of everything.
- The Wonder of Evolution - The wonder of the first replicator was not how amazingly well it replicated, but that a first replicator could arise, at all, by pure accident, in the primordial seas of Earth. That first replicator would undoubtedly be devoured in an instant by a sophisticated modern bacterium. Likewise, the wonder of evolution itself is not how well it works, but that a brainless, accidentally occurringoptimization process can work at all. If you praise
...