User Profile

star1
description19
message446

Recent Posts

Curated Posts
starCurated - Recent, high quality posts selected by the LessWrong moderation team.
rss_feed Create an RSS Feed
Frontpage Posts
Posts meeting our frontpage guidelines: • interesting, insightful, useful • aim to explain, not to persuade • avoid meta discussion • relevant to people whether or not they are involved with the LessWrong community.
(includes curated content and frontpage posts)
rss_feed Create an RSS Feed
Personal Blogposts
personPersonal blogposts by LessWrong users (as well as curated and frontpage).
rss_feed Create an RSS Feed

What's up with Arbital?

1y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
91

Toy problem: increase production or use production?

4y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
8

Quantum Decisions

4y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
20

Personal examples of semantic stopsigns

4y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
71

Maximizing Your Donations via a Job

5y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
58

Low hanging fruit: analyzing your nutrition

6y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
15

Robot Programmed To Love Goes Too Far (link)

6y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
11

I'm starting a game company and looking for a co-founder.

6y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
80

Water Fluoridation

6y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
31

What happens when your beliefs fully propagate

6y
Show Highlightsubdirectory_arrow_left
79

Recent Comments

This will take a long time to load, but it's comprehensive: https://arbital.com/explore/math/

I'm not sure when you tried. It works right now.

Hmm, I'm skeptical a barter system would work. I don't think I've seen a successful implementation of it anywhere, though I do hear about people trying.

Yes, we've considered paying people, but that's not scalable. (A good 3-5 page explanation might take 10 hours to write.)

It's not open sourced.

The pages might take a while to load (up to 30 seconds).

I can imagine a neural-activation-like effect coming out of that, where frequently co-active posts naturally rise to the top of each other's links and become threads or topics.

Not sure what you mean by this.

My guess for Wikipedia's success is that they were one of the first; and there was more of a sense of an online community back then. Also it's easier to create Wikipedia content than, say, a good explanation. StackOverflow succeeded because asking and answering questions is pretty easy, you get inst...(read more)

I'm not into persuading people. :) If you want to write, go for it. I still think Arbital is a really good platform for writing up math explanations.

Not someone with sufficient authority, just the blog owner. That seems fair though. You can create you own blog and then you would be in charge of which comments to approve.

Yes, but that's not "invite-only".

How is it invite only? Are you talking about the comment section?

Originally the plan was to do exactly that if we couldn't figure how to build a "joyful maze": just throw open the doors and see what people do with it. Unfortunately there is still a significant amount of work left to do that *well*...(read more)