The March of Folly: From Troy to Vietnam by Barbara Tuchman.
So far, I've only read the introduction. It pulls together things I already believe, so I like it.First thought is James C. Scott's work-- Two Cheers for Anarchism is a good starting point. He writes about tyranny's demands for legibility.Also, a lot of science requires taking a close look at the world.See also "the map is not the territory"-- but it takes time to see the territory.I've been doing qi gong-- it's amazingly easy to think I know what I'm feeling physically, and a lot of work to actually start to notice it.And I've been thinking that a way for rationalism to go wrong is to think that good enough concepts reliably trump observation. Sometimes concepts work-- perpetual motion machines really are impossible-- but mostly you need to keep looking at the world.
Maybe there's an organization to contribute to, though I grant that isn't much of an observance. Other than that, there's telling the story.
I've found that searching on [name of product or company sucks] can turn up interesting results, or a significant lack of results.Look at customer reviews, especially those with a geeky level of detail.
Thanks. What is your culture?
Any thoughts about supporting biodiversity (perhaps especially for food crops)?
Rats could be a good bit better than average, and still pretty bad.
Yes. Now how do we sieve good information out of this environment?
Did Vassar argue that existing EA organizations weren't doing the work they said they were doing, or that EA as such was a bad idea? Or maybe that it was too hard to get organizations to do it?