1.1. It’s the first place large enough to contain a plausible explanation for how the AGI itself actually came to be.
According to this criterion we would be in a simulation because there is no plausible explanation of how the Universe was created.
The key here would be an exact quantification: how much carbs do these cultures consume in relation to the amount of physical activity.
Has the hypothesis
excess sugar/carbs -> metabolic syndrome -> constant hunger and overeating -> weight gain
been disproved?
Rather, my read of the history is that MIRI was operating in an argumentative argument where:
argumentative environment?
If we have to use voice, we can still try to ask hard questions and get fast answers, but because of the lower rate itâs hard to push far past human limits.
You could go with IQ-test-type progressively harder number sequences.Use big numbers that are hard to calculate in your head.
E.g. start with a random 3 digit number, each following number is the previous squared minus 17. If he/she figures it out in 1 second he must be an ai.
If you like Yudkowskian fiction, Wertifloke = Eliezer Yudkowsky
The Waves Arisen https://wertifloke.wordpress.com/
Is it ok to omit facts to you lawyer? I mean is the lawyer entitled to know everything about the client?
Could you please give a definition of the word valence? The definition I found doesn't make sense to me: https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/valence