LESSWRONG
LW

79
Yair Halberstadt
3439Ω1845790
Message
Dialogue
Subscribe

Posts

Sorted by New

Wikitag Contributions

Comments

Sorted by
Newest
No wikitag contributions to display.
7Yair Halberstadt's Shortform
3y
16
Cheap Labour Everywhere
Yair Halberstadt12d30

Ok, you are technically correct, but in practice even in cheap labour societies a lot less than half of households have full time help.

Reply
Cheap Labour Everywhere
Yair Halberstadt12d198

India's birth rates are falling rapidly, and already below replacement.

Also note the impossibility that over half the population has full time house help... cheap labour only helps the well off.

Reply1
Yair Halberstadt's Shortform
Yair Halberstadt22d50

More details here https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1975079984776577153

Reply
Yair Halberstadt's Shortform
Yair Halberstadt22d50

Apparently BS: https://x.com/cremieuxrecueil/status/1975057814696677733

Reply
Yair Halberstadt's Shortform
Yair Halberstadt23d150

Has anyone looked into the recent Chinese paper claiming to have reversed aging in monkeys?

Is it real or BS?

https://www.cell.com/cell/abstract/S0092-8674(25)00571-9?_returnURL=https%3A%2F%2Flinkinghub.elsevier.com%2Fretrieve%2Fpii%2FS0092867425005719%3Fshowall%3Dtrue

Reply
The Cloud Drinks Local
Yair Halberstadt2mo20

Thanks for clarifying, please keep in mind LessWrongs policy on AI generated content: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/KXujJjnmP85u8eM6B/policy-for-llm-writing-on-lesswrong

Reply
The Cloud Drinks Local
Yair Halberstadt2mo34

This seems to me like it was partly generated or rewritten by an LLM. Is that correct?

Reply1
All Exponentials are Eventually S-Curves
Yair Halberstadt2mo52

Your complaining about how the graph is drawn, and hope to fix that by drawing a graph that is almost certainly wrong? At least the graph they drew only relies on actual past data.

I agree they would do better to acknowledge that whilst the growth is currently exponential, it will have to stop at some point but we have no idea when. That gets a bit tiring after a while though.

Reply
All Exponentials are Eventually S-Curves
Yair Halberstadt2mo94

Because it has the wrong shape in every way that matters if they draw an s curve with us at the halfway point (which seems to be the natural failure mode), and they're actually at the 1 percent mark. The s curve isn't particularly illuminating over simply saying this exponential will stop at some point but we don't know when, but unfortunately tends to lend itself to overconfident predictions.

Reply
All Exponentials are Eventually S-Curves
Yair Halberstadt2mo94

Whilst technically true, those who attempt to use this fact to predict future growth tend to end up just as wrong as those who don't.

All exponentials end, but if you don't know when you need to prepare equally for the scenario where it ends tomorrow, and the one where it ends with the universe in paperclips.

Reply
Load More
18Thinking Mathematically - Convergent Sequences
20d
5
61GDM also claims IMO gold medal
3mo
3
19Don't fight your LLM, redirect it!
3mo
2
31If Not Now, When?
4mo
3
194Gemini Diffusion: watch this space
5mo
39
-22Caplan's being melodramatic about circumcision
6mo
1
22Fake AI lawsuits to drive links
6mo
0
13How to end credentialism
6mo
15
6The case for creating unaligned superintelligence
7mo
0
14Gemini 2.5 Pro released
7mo
0
Load More