LESSWRONG
LW

Personal Blog

17

Reductionism reading list

by lukeprog
24th Jun 2011
1 min read
9

17

Personal Blog

17

Reductionism reading list
5[anonymous]
1lukeprog
0lukstafi
1atucker
0timtyler
0BenLowell
-1Peterdjones
0XiXiDu
0Morendil
New Comment
9 comments, sorted by
top scoring
Click to highlight new comments since: Today at 12:23 AM
[-][anonymous]14y50

Do any of the items on the reading list besides Yudkowsky's sequence deal with dissolving the question to cognitive algorithms? I don't know if this idea has been spotted in academia or if it's just a LessWrong/AI-researcher-turned-philosopher thing.

Also, I would recommend adding Gary Drescher's Good and Real to the list.

Reply
[-]lukeprog14y10

Duh, Drescher! Added. Thanks.

As for dissolving the question to cognitive algorithms, there are certainly many philosophers and scientists who have written about why the brain produces certain unfounded debates in philosophy. See...

  • 'Explaining the cognitive processes that generate our intuitions'
  • 'Greene's work on moral judgment'
  • 'Dennett's Freedom Evolves'
  • 'Talbot on intuitionism about consciousness'
  • 'The mechanism behind Gettier intuitions'

...in this comment.

Reply
[-]lukstafi14y00

Reductionism "from mystery to science" is hardly a reductionism...

[This comment is no longer endorsed by its author]Reply
[-]atucker14y10

Godel Escher Bach (by Douglas Hofstadter) is what put me into the reductionist camp, but I imagine other things could do it faster.

Reply
[-]timtyler14y00

Hofstadter's key "reductionism" diagram from “Prelude…Ant fugue” is now online.

Reply
[-]BenLowell14y00

I'm really glad that I read Hayawaka's Language in Thought and Action after Eliezer's recommendations.

Physics textbooks helped me gain some insights. Reductionism is in the equations. The way that complex behavior such as masses bouncing on springs or arbitrary waves can always be broken down into sums of simpler behavior. I would look up Fourier transforms and superimposition of normal modes.

Reply
[-]Peterdjones14y-10

The way that complex behavior such as masses bouncing on springs or arbitrary waves can always be broken down into sums of simpler behavior

"Always" in textbook examples. Not always in all cases: the intractable cases don;t make it into textbooks. Physiists have written against the assumption of universal reductionism.

Reply
[-]XiXiDu14y00

Accompanying text: The scourge of perverse-mindedness

Reply
[-]Morendil14y00

Two of Dennett's - Darwin's Dangerous Idea and Consciousness Explained.

Reply
Moderation Log
More from lukeprog
View more
Curated and popular this week
9Comments

 

  • Yudkowsky, Reductionism sequence (2008)
  • Ladyman et al., Every Thing Must Go: Metaphysics Naturalized (2007)
  • Bickle, Philosophy and Neuroscience: A Ruthlessly Reductive Account (2003)
  • Bickle, 'Real Reduction in Real Neuroscience' (2008)
  • Glimcher, Foundations of Neuroeconomic Analysis (2010)
  • Ney, 'Reductionism' [for Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy] (2008)
  • Hohwy & Kallestrup (eds.), Being Reduced (2008)
  • Drescher, Good and Real (2006)

 

I can't endorse everything in all these works, but they each provide insights into understanding reduction.

What else do ya'll recommend?