Examples, analogies and lingo all make posts easier to understand. So then, I want to encourage people to write more comments like:
- X is an example of what you're describing.
- Y might be a good analogy for this.
- Z could be a good term for that.
I see comments like this sometimes, but much less frequently than I would like. And I suspect that readers often have thoughts like "Z could be a good term for that", but don't think it's worth saying. I think these comments are almost always worth saying.
Examples, analogies and lingo seem like such great things to crowdsource. Even if the post author is intimately familiar with the post's content, I would expect 100 readers who are vaguely familiar with the content to do a better job of coming up with examples, analogies and lingo than the single post author. They're just the sorts of things that benefit a lot from a diversity of viewpoints, it seems to me.
Let's say I'm wrong in the above section and the reality is that the post author is better than the crowd at coming up with good examples, analogies and phrases. Even so, sometimes the "good" example from the post author doesn't make much sense to a particular reader whereas a "mediocre" example from a commenter is what makes it click.
Scott Alexander does a great job of talking about this concept in his post Non-Expert Explanation.
Post authors don't always do a good job
Coming up with good examples, analogies and lingo is hard! There's a lot of times when I have an idea in my mind that I want to write about but I get stuck because I have trouble coming up with good examples, analogies or lingo. There are also times when I post it anyway, knowing that I haven't done a good job with those things.
I doubt I'm alone. I doubt that every time someone clicks "Submit" on a post that they think they've done as good a job as possible in the examples, analogies and lingo they've used.