Today's post, Unbounded Scales, Huge Jury Awards, & Futurism was originally published on 29 November 2007. A summary (taken from the LW wiki):


Without a metric for comparison, estimates of, e.g., what sorts of punitive damages should be awarded, or when some future advance will happen, vary widely simply due to the lack of a scale.

Discuss the post here (rather than in the comments to the original post).

This post is part of the Rerunning the Sequences series, where we'll be going through Eliezer Yudkowsky's old posts in order so that people who are interested can (re-)read and discuss them. The previous post was Evaluability (And Cheap Holiday Shopping), and you can use the sequence_reruns tag or rss feed to follow the rest of the series.

Sequence reruns are a community-driven effort. You can participate by re-reading the sequence post, discussing it here, posting the next day's sequence reruns post, or summarizing forthcoming articles on the wiki. Go here for more details, or to have meta discussions about the Rerunning the Sequences series.

New Comment
2 comments, sorted by Click to highlight new comments since: Today at 11:38 PM

The link to the post is incorrect; it points to the previous rerun, should point here:

Edit: It has been fixed. Thanks. :)

Typo in the wiki: punitive is spelled as punative.

New to LessWrong?