New Comment
2 comments, sorted by Click to highlight new comments since: Today at 10:32 PM

Lately I’ve been requiring a higher bar than the Turing Test. I propose “Anything that can program, and can converse convincingly in natural language about what it is programming must be thinking.”

I feel like this too low a bar, a programmer can still give the program the rules for what programming is, and the rules for what language is. A true AGI must make its' own rules.