This is a special post for quick takes by Jacob Pfau. Only they can create top-level comments. Comments here also appear on the Quick Takes page and All Posts page.
For each paper, count what percentage of citing papers are also in ANDB vs not in ANDB (or use some other way of classifying safety vs not safety papers)
Analyze differences by subject area / author affiliation
My hypothesis: RLHF, and OpenAI work in general, has high capabilities impact. For other domains e.g. interpretability, preventing bad behavior, agent foundations, I have high uncertainty over percentages.