I think they are decent! I have quibbles, but they are definitely better than the current state.
If I were you, I would focus on writing descriptions for the concepts and wikitags that are somewhat unique to the rationality community. Nobody is really going to benefit that much from a paragraph defining "social skills", but one defining "distillation" is a lot more useful.
I personally like them! They don't specifically benefit me because I already have most of that knowledge, but I think having definitions attached to the tags is far superior to not having them, so I appreciate your efforts here. (And the definitions themselves also looked reasonable, being both concise and accurate as definitions should be.)
I've become increasingly interested in the topic of organizational knowledge management (i.e. how communities can most effectively store, distill, and share the information they create).
This has manifested in a drive to create a summary for every LW wikitag stub that isn't behind a "Load More" button click (i.e. among the top 30 tags under each Core Tag). I've done 9 so far and I'd love to get some feedback.
Are the summaries I'm writing near the mark of what the community thinks they should be? At the meta level, is there a better way I could leverage my interest in knowledge management / distillation to benefit the community?