Today's post, Failure By Analogy was originally published on 18 November 2008. A summary (taken from the LW wiki):
It's very tempting to reason that your invention X will do Y, because it is similar to thing Z, which also does Y. But reality very often ignores this justification for why your new invention will work.
Discuss the post here (rather than in the comments to the original post).This post is part of the Rerunning the Sequences series, where we'll be going through Eliezer Yudkowsky's old posts in order so that people who are interested can (re-)read and discuss them. The previous post was Logical or Connectionist AI?, and you can use the sequence_reruns tag or rss feed to follow the rest of the series.Sequence reruns are a community-driven effort. You can participate by re-reading the sequence post, discussing it here, posting the next day's sequence reruns post, or summarizing forthcoming articles on the wiki. Go here for more details, or to have meta discussions about the Rerunning the Sequences series.