Thomas Kwa responded to my notes on frontpaging Why I Left Google DeepMind. I didn't want to make the comment section about this and it seemed like it might turn into a sprawling metadiscussion, so I put it over here.
It would have been an outrage IMO to not frontpage this, so I'm glad it's frontpaged. It's super timeless and valuable, and the opinions were tactfully conveyed and necessary for the post.
To not express strong opinions about Google Alex would have to self-censor, which is counter to the entire spirit of the post and would make it substantially harder to follow his strategic and moral thinking.
I agree "the post does a good job being frontpage" (like obviously we agree on that). But, you seem worried about some class of problem that's orthogonal to or ignoring why we have a frontpage distinction.
Plenty of good posts are not frontpage.
Sometimes, a good post has hypothetical frontpage version of itself but the "real post" won't be frontpage. In those cases, the standard recommendation is "write the frontpage version, and a separate version that covers the less-frontpagey parts."
In this case that wasn't necessary (In addition to generally being a good, timeless piece, this also does the "social move" part in a minimal, evenhanded, factual way that I liked).
(Alex also made a separate post that was "even more frontpagey", just focusing on the internal governance details).
But, it sounds like you don't like that I was even counting "is a social move" in the "evidence for not frontpaging" column, and, dunno what to tell you other than "yep, there are some costs to having the frontpage policy that might even come up." (Or, maybe seems like think I'm saying it's bad that this was nonzero a social move? I don't think that! Social moves are correct sometimes! "counts somewhat against frontpage" !== "shouldn't have been made")
Ah, that's fair. I didn't mean it was close to the bar.
I actually hadn't thought that much about exactly how close it was bar (it was sufficiently obviously over-the-bar upon reflection). The motivation for the notice was
a) the considerations were something I hadn't quite thought through and articulated before
b) if you hadn't paid much attention to the content and were just going off initial vibes, it'd be less obvious
c) future people who do similar writeups that are some mix of "somewhat less timeless, somewhat more social-move-y" might get a different decision.
If it’s worth saying, but not worth its own post, here's a place to put it.
If you are new to LessWrong, here's the place to introduce yourself. Personal stories, anecdotes, or just general comments on how you found us and what you hope to get from the site and community are invited. This is also the place to discuss feature requests and other ideas you have for the site, if you don't want to write a full top-level post.
If you're new to the community, you can start reading the Highlights from the Sequences, a collection of posts about the core ideas of LessWrong.
If you want to explore the community more, I recommend reading the Library, checking recent Curated posts, seeing if there are any meetups in your area, and checking out the Getting Started section of the LessWrong FAQ. If you want to orient to the content on the site, you can also check out the Concepts section.
The Open Thread tag is here. The Open Thread sequence is here.