https://polypharmacy.substack.com/p/are-we-treating-bipolar-ii-disorder the case that we should treat bipolar ii more like depression. IMO, this is true if-and-only-if "hypomania" is not that bad, which the author (a psychiatrist) seems to think (and his clinical experience counts for something, but not everything). If hypomania is truly life-ruining, then it's worth having more side-effect-heavy meds and worse depression treatment in order to prevent hypomanic episodes.
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/niPHLviGAWzzZTzit/you-don-t-get-to-have-cool-flaws I don't really agree with this. In my thirties I've been converging towards being more blasé about flaws; all people have them, having flaws doesn't make one unlovable or unsuccessful, everybody who has ever been kind to you has probably seen your flaws and overlooked them, it is healthy to be fond of your natural personality/quirks/dispositions on the whole, etc. I'm not saying not to give up bad habits or work on weaknesses, but it's more practical to say "yes obviously i have a weakness here, that's why i work on it and don't specialize in areas that require excellence in my weak spot" than to seriously aim to have zero weaknesses.
https://slatestarcodex.com/2016/04/04/the-ideology-is-not-the-movement/ this is plainly true. The "rationalist community" is not even a little bit close to "the people who are rational". There are plenty of irrational community members and rational non-community members. If you want to make exceptional claims about your own virtue, be my guest, but be prepared to defend them to skeptics, and don't expect them to apply to everybody in the same part of the social graph as you.