interestingly I'm reading this just as I'm hearing other people discuss how fruitless it is to write publicly, because nobody will understand you and take action based on your words. I think it probably depends how you write and what concepts you're trying to get across, and what your bar is for "action." People who think essays are useful are probably trying to reach across shorter inferential distances and make smaller nudges to people's behavior.
https://www.rationalistjudaism.com/p/the-kezayis-post what is the minimum amount of matzah one is required to eat on Passover? traditionally it's "the size of an olive." but some people claim it's about the size of a large pizza...because Biblical olives were huge??? (spoiler: no, they were not. we literally have thousand-year-old olive trees producing normal-sized olives.)
https://www.read.ai/ this is a fascinating app. Link it to your calendar and Zoom and it will accompany on you on all your meetings, summarize them, generate action items, and grade you on things like how fast you speak and how much other people seem to like you.
"bias" is their word for "how much positive emotion do you show", which is a terrible word for that! did they let the statisticians do too much product design?
they will also keep track of how many "non-inclusive" things you say, apparently. i'm still at zero, not being much for slurs myself.
transcription accuracy is pretty good, but the app is often wrong about who's speaking.