I do not represent (or often, even acknowledge the existence or cohesion of) "the community". For myself, I didn't read it, for the following reasons:
it started by telling me not to bother. "Epistemic Status: First draft, written quickly", and "This is a tedious, step-by-step rebuttal" of something I hadn't paid that much attention to in the first place. Not a strong start.
Scott's piece was itself a reaction to something I never cared that much about.
Both you and Scott (and whoever started this nonsense) are arguing about words, not ideas