It's hard to tell how good you are at something, until you try it.

Most people don't try most things, so advice like "follow your passion" or "unlock your inner child" are drawing on a terrifyingly small pool of things you've actually tried. And our best skills may not have obvious correlations, and a person's distribution of skills could be lumpy and all-over-the-place. (The exception being IQ, which kinda helps a lot of things. But you can't "specialize" just in "tasks that are easier at this IQ level".).

Example: "gaming" seems like a specific, not-super-useful skill. But video games can be wildly different from each other. I have bad aim and awareness in FPS games, but I'm unusually good at The Wiki Game. I think this is a combination of some tiny subskills I excel at, like "bus-ticket obsession with some trivia" and "making random torturous connections between topics".

Being good at The Wiki Game isn't that valuable, but it matches some subskills. And some things that are (or seem) valuable, don't match your subskills.

So here's what I'm looking for:

  • Large lists of tiny, oddly-specific skills. Less "Programming", more "pattern recognition (logic)" and "problem precisification" and "interpreting what someone wants" and "efficient googling".
  • Free/cheap quick ways to test skills. What's the quickest thing I can do, to see if my brain easily turns sideways in that particular dimension?
  • Large or systematic attempts to match tiny skills with jobs, hobbies, fields, and things-you-can-do-for-others. "You're really fast at that shape task, have you considered going into surveying?"

EDIT: see also: discussion on reddit.

New Answer
New Comment

2 Answers sorted by



Gallups CliftonStrengths (formerly StrengthsFinder) is about finding what people are good. This then allows job recommendation.

I remember taking something like this in high school! This is a decent example of what I'm looking for! Not quite the database-of-tiny-skills, but it seems to target the more-specific-strengths thing.



I remember in high school taking the ASVAB test (Armed Services Vocational Aptitude Battery) which is aimed at finding a good match between your abilities and a potential role in the military.  However it was good at testing a wide variety of aptitudes, from physical to intellectual.

Also when I applied for a residency position in orthopedic surgery, one program gave all its applicants a test of visual-spatial ability.  One activity I remember on it was, given a folded out piece of paper with fold lines, identify the structure it would fold up into.  Perhaps good visual-spatial ability is important when performing surgery.  I'd expect this skill is also required in a few other types of occupations: architecture, flying, carpentry, etc.

Or you could pretend you're an NFL candidate and take the Wonderlic test.

There is a wide variety of skills you could explore: people skills, animal handling skills, gardening, construction, repair, spatial skills, vehicle or tool handling, and many subtypes of intellectual skills.

These are intriguing, thanks! But I guess I'm looking for things like these where each skill-section is unbundled. Like if each category of the ASVAB, were its own test.

2 comments, sorted by Click to highlight new comments since:

It's not clear to me what you mean with skill. IQ isn't traditionally seen as a skill but as a proprety. Skills in traditional conception are things people learn. The word tiny implies that it's about skill that are smaller and thus need less time to learn.

When it comes to picking a career, skills can be learned and whether or not you already have skills beforehand doesn't tell you about what you can learn. 

I think I'm describing natural strengths, and I just didn't think to call it that until you pointed it out just now. I thought linking "Parable of the Talents" would intuition-pump that, but I should be more explicit in the future.