I've personally gone from thinking that Glinda-like characters are insanely psychologically unrealistic (out of typical-mind fallacy) to thinking that they are much more common in real life than Elphaba-like characters are.
I had a pretty different read.
Mostly, I think Elphaba is a genuinely bad person. When they first meet, Glinda is like "I'm so sorry you're green, but I'm studying {madeup magic category xyz}, maybe eventually I can help", and Elphaba is like "how dare you imply that being green is thing to be fixed, you're so shallow and I'm not". Then in the very next scene, she sings her song about how her greatest wish is to be un-greened by the wizard. Similarly, when Glinda tries to help her get more popular, she pretends to be above the attempt, only to then try to implement the advice in the next scene. Then as you mentioned, the "blonde comment". All of this proves that she's not above looks in any way whatsoever; they're in fact both equally obsessed with popularity, the only difference is that one of them is honest about it and also good at it, whereas the other is lying/self-deluded and also bad at it.
Elphaba also isn't that much of a victim, really. Yes she's green, which sucks, but she also has incredible powers and a rich father. I feel like she got dealt a pretty okay hand overall.
So to me the most interesting thing is that Elphaba has the stereotypical victim role and Glinda the steretypical spoiler entitled brat role, but if you take a closer look, I'd argue that Glinda is actually just a better person. Has much more self-awareness, too. As for what this all means or what message the movie sends, I don't know, it ended before the story was complete. (And the ending didn't make any sense; both Elphaba running away and the teacher declaring her an enemy before giving her a chance to come back are counterproductive for the character's goals.) It really depends on what they do in part two.
I read a fantasy book with this plot once, where it turned out that the good and wise king—the protagonist’s main distant ally in a frightening world—really just had magic that let him commit murder then have eyewitnesses believe his words claiming innocence.
o3 believes this refers to Graceling, though the plot synopsis doesn't suggest a perfect match. Could you confirm/discomfirm?
I watched Wicked (the 2024 movie) with my ex and his family at Christmas. My current stance is that it was pretty fun but not especially incredible or deep. I could be pretty wrong—watching movies isn’t my strong suit, but I do like chatting about them afterwards. Some thoughts:
Given her situation of being aggressively mistreated and perceiving great ills in the world around her, I don’t know that she behaves particularly relatably, admirably or interestingly for most of the movie. She is defensive and incurious and doesn’t seem to have much going on until the most blatant wrong falls into her lap. (And this wrong is even being committed against one of her only friends, making acting on it particularly socially easy and called-for by basic decency.) So I guess her character also seems hard to be invested in. I’m not sure what makes a sympathetic victim-hero feel like a pure incarnation of a moving archetype versus an on-the-nose trope review, but for me it landed a bit too much as the latter.
I read a fantasy book with this plot once, where it turned out that the good and wise king—the protagonist’s main distant ally in a frightening world—really just had magic that let him commit murder then have eyewitnesses believe his words claiming innocence. So all word about him was good, but at his side you realized the truth, maybe only for a moment between murder and amnesia! That was a plot twist that stuck with me. Maybe Wicked wasn’t meant to get a big punch from that, or maybe it did for others—but it was a key element of the story, and for me this part kind of rolled by without moving me.