edoarad | v1.55.0 | (+683/-535) added Consider.it and minor edits | ||
Ruby | v1.54.0 | |||
habrykaTest | v1.53.0 | |||
Venryx | v1.52.0 | (+231/-160) /* Debate Map */ Updated the url for the Debate Map site. | ||
JustMichael1984 | v1.51.0 | (+394) /* Added DebateArt to the list of debate tools */ | ||
Venryx | v1.50.0 | (+787) /* List of debate tools */ Added an entry for another debate-mapping website. (disclaimer: I'm the creator and developer) | ||
gwern | v1.49.0 | (-31) Reverted edits by [[Special:Contributions/Marimeoa|Marimeoa]] ([[User talk:Marimeoa|talk]]) to last revision by [[User:Gwern|Gwern]] | ||
Marimeoa | v1.48.0 | (+31) /* Other links */ | ||
gwern | v1.47.0 | (-119) rv doubleteaming | ||
gwern | v1.46.0 | (-33) Reverted edits by [[Special:Contributions/Jamesmea|Jamesmea]] ([[User talk:Jamesmea|talk]]) to last revision by [[User:Emesmeo|Emesmeo]] |
Summary: Web platform for collaborativeTree-based mapping of beliefs, arguments, and evidence.
Summary: Debating platform with rich one-on-one debates functionality and advanced discussions forum.
Summary: Web platform for collaborative mapping of beliefs, arguments, and evidence.
This wiki page and tag gives a list and characterization of debate tools. Debate tools were previously discussed
on the bloghere.Literature
Note: Perhaps discussion should goThere exists an academic literature on argument mapping and other tools (computer aided or not) for assisting debate. The most recent survey seems to be "Computer-supported argumentation: A review of thediscussionstate of the art" written in June 2009, which lists 50 tools (starting on page 94).Online Deliberation
, oris a related discipline that asks what are thecomments threadeffects ofthe original post.online discussions, when are they effective, and how to design better systems.LiteratureConsider.it
There exists an academic literature on argument mappingGraphically represents people's agreement with a statement andother tools (computer aided or not) for assisting debate.which arguments were most used. Themost recent survey seems to be "Computer-supported argumentation: A reviewarguments themselves are not subjects ofthe statefurther investigation though. Check out this use-case ofthe art" writtenpublic decisions inJune 2009, which lists 50 tools (starting on page 94).Seattle.Blog postsDebate tools: an experience reportbyMorendilArgument Maps Improve Critical ThinkingbyJohnicholasTakeOnIt: Database of Expert OpinionsbyEliezer Yudkowsky