| v1.7.0 | (+115) add Tyler Cowen TEDx talk | |||
| v1.6.0 | (+46/-46) | |||
| v1.5.0 | (+5/-182) The remark about existential risk might belong to existential risk article, but it doesn't seem prominent in the bias itself. | |||
| v1.4.0 | (+177) | |||
| v1.3.0 | (+16) /* Blog posts */ | |||
| v1.2.0 | (+17) /* See also */ | |||
| v1.1.0 | (+4) | |||
| v1.0.0 | (+225) Created page with 'Optimizing predictions for sounding good as stories, when nature optimizes for no such thing, creates a bias that [[Nick Bostrom]] [http://www.nickbostrom.com/existential/risks.h...' |
Optimizing predictions for sounding good as stories, when nature optimizes for no such thing, creates a bias that Nick Bostrom has termed good-story bias. If a disaster kills off all sentient life quickly and without warning, that's a boring story and therefore one of which we might underestimate the plausibility.bias.
Optimizing predictions for sounding good as stories, when nature optimizes for no such thing, creates a bias that Nick Bostrom has termed good-story bias. If a disaster kills off all sentient life quickly and without warning, that's a boring story and therefore one of which we might underestimate the plausibility.
Optimizing predictions for sounding good as stories, when nature optimizes for no such thing, creates a bias that Nick Bostrom has termed good-story bias.
Optimizing predictions for sounding good as stories, when nature optimizes for no such thing, creates a bias that Nick Bostromtermed good-story bias.