Paul Crowley | v1.7.0Aug 11th 2010 | (+115) add Tyler Cowen TEDx talk | ||
PeerInfinity | v1.6.0Sep 28th 2009 | (+46/-46) | ||
Vladimir_Nesov | v1.5.0Sep 3rd 2009 | (+5/-182) The remark about existential risk might belong to existential risk article, but it doesn't seem prominent in the bias itself. | ||
steven0461 | v1.4.0Sep 3rd 2009 | (+177) | ||
Vladimir_Nesov | v1.3.0Sep 3rd 2009 | (+16) /* Blog posts */ | ||
Vladimir_Nesov | v1.2.0Sep 3rd 2009 | (+17) /* See also */ | ||
steven0461 | v1.1.0Sep 3rd 2009 | (+4) | ||
steven0461 | v1.0.0Sep 3rd 2009 | (+225) Created page with 'Optimizing predictions for sounding good as stories, when nature optimizes for no such thing, creates a bias that [[Nick Bostrom]] [http://www.nickbostrom.com/existential/risks.h...' |
Optimizing predictions for sounding good as stories, when nature optimizes for no such thing, creates a bias that Nick Bostrom has termed good-story bias. If a disaster kills off all sentient life quickly and without warning, that's a boring story and therefore one of which we might underestimate the plausibility.bias.
Optimizing predictions for sounding good as stories, when nature optimizes for no such thing, creates a bias that Nick Bostrom has termed good-story bias. If a disaster kills off all sentient life quickly and without warning, that's a boring story and therefore one of which we might underestimate the plausibility.
Optimizing predictions for sounding good as stories, when nature optimizes for no such thing, creates a bias that Nick Bostrom has termed good-story bias.
Optimizing predictions for sounding good as stories, when nature optimizes for no such thing, creates a bias that Nick Bostromtermed good-story bias.
External links