Ruby | v1.12.0Sep 25th 2020 | |||
Chriswaterguy | v1.11.0Aug 21st 2016 | Fix broken link | ||
Grognor | v1.10.0Feb 29th 2012 | (+68/-75) | ||
Vladimir_Nesov | v1.9.0Oct 30th 2010 | (+26) /* Other posts */ | ||
Vladimir_Nesov | v1.8.0Jul 27th 2010 | (+5/-4) /* Blog posts */ | ||
Vladimir_Nesov | v1.7.0Jul 27th 2010 | (+66/-74) | ||
Vladimir_Nesov | v1.6.0Jul 27th 2010 | (+19) /* Related concepts */ | ||
Zack_M_Davis | v1.5.0Nov 17th 2009 | (-42) byline removal | ||
Vladimir_Nesov | v1.4.0Sep 8th 2009 | (-2) | ||
Vladimir_Nesov | v1.3.0Jul 4th 2009 | (+15/-15) /* Related concepts */ |
A statement that is literally true, but causes the listener to attain false beliefs by performing incorrect inference, is not technically a lie. Since the purpose of communication is to transfer beliefs to the other person's mind, there is little practical distinction between a lying and not technically lying. Depending on circumstances, one may be preferable to another, but only by a slim margin. A weapon of dark arts, or an attire for someone identifying with truth-telling.
Main postBlog postsNot Technically LyingbyPsychohistorianThe Bottom LineOther postsThe Bottom LineNot Technically Lying by Psychohistorian