| v1.8.0 | ||||
| v1.7.0 | (-21) byline removal | |||
| v1.6.0 | (+22) added a link | |||
| v1.5.0 | ||||
| v1.4.0 | moved [[The Top 1% Fallacy]] to [[The top 1% fallacy]] | |||
| v1.3.0 | (+10/-85) | |||
| v1.2.0 | ||||
| v1.1.0 | (-571) | |||
| v1.0.0 | (+706) Created page with 'Everyone thinks they're hiring the top 1%. Martin Fowler said, “We are still working hard to hire only the very top fraction of software developers (the target is around the t...' |
Everyone thinks they're hiring the top 1%. Martin Fowler said, “We are still working hard to hire only the very top fraction of software developers (the target is around the top 0.5 to 1%).” I hear this from almost every software company. "We hire the top 1% or less," they all say. Could they all be hiring the top 1%? Where are all the other 99%? General Motors?
When you get 200 resumes, and hire the best person, does that mean you're hiring the top 0.5%? Think about what happens to the other 199 that you didn't hire. They go look for another job. --Joel on Software
Everyone thinks they're hiring the top 1%. Martin Fowler said, “We are still working hard to hire only the very top fraction of software developers (the target is around the top 0.5 to 1%).” I hear this from almost every software company. "We hire the top 1% or less," they all say. Could they all be hiring the top 1%? Where are all the other 99%? General Motors?
When you get 200 resumes, and hire the best person, does that mean you're hiring the top 0.5%? Think about what happens to the other 199 that you didn't hire. They go look for another job. --Joel on Software