Consensus

Applied to Why Democracy? by sxae 2y ago

A Consensus is a general or full agreement between members of a group. A consensus can be useful in deciding what's true (e.g, a scientific consensus), or as a criteria in decision making. A False Consensus can happen when someone thinks a position is in consensus when it isn't. one can also claim a consensus falsely to advance their position and make it difficult for others to oppose it. a False Controversy can happen when one mistakes something to not be in consensus when in fact it is. Claiming false controversies is a common way of creating uncertainty and doubt.

Applied to Sunset at Noon by Yoav Ravid 2y ago

Notable things that aren't in consensus on LessWrong include Blackmail / Extortion, the benefits of rationality, AI Timelines and AI Takeoff, as well as AI alignment strategies

Applied to Everybody Knows by Yoav Ravid 2y ago

There are many things that are considered a consensus on LessWrong, even though they're are not considered a consensus in the scientific community, such as: One-Boxing, cooperating on the Prisoner's Dilemma,  Bayesianism over frequentist probability (and more to be added)

Related Pages: Disagreement, Modesty, Modesty argument, Aumann agreement, Government (in the context of democracies)

A Consensus is a general or full agreement between members of a group. A consensus can be useful in deciding what's true (e.g, a scientific consensus), or as a criteria in decision making. A False Consensus can happen when someone thinks a position is in consensus when it isn't. one can also claim a consensus falsely to advance their position and make it difficult for others to oppose it.

There are many things that are considered a consensus on LessWrong, even though they're are not considered a consensus in the scientific community, such as: One-Boxing, cooperating on the Prisoner's Dilemma (and more to be added)

Related Pages:Disagreement, Modesty, Modesty argument, Aumann agreement