627

LESSWRONG
LW

626
Personal Blog

6

[SEQ RERUN] The Parable of Hemlock

by MinibearRex
6th Jan 2012
1 min read
2

6

Personal Blog

6

[SEQ RERUN] The Parable of Hemlock
5MileyCyrus
0buybuydandavis
New Comment
2 comments, sorted by
top scoring
Click to highlight new comments since: Today at 7:33 PM
[-]MileyCyrus14y50

This why it is incorrect to say that Pluto "used to be" a planet. According the new definition of planet, Pluto was never a planet. And according the old definition, Pluto still is a planet. Nothing about Pluto changed in 2006.

In a world where "leg" means tail, dogs still have four legs.

Reply
[-]buybuydandavis14y00

You can paint "horse" on a pig, but he won't win the Kentucky Derby.

Reply
Moderation Log
More from MinibearRex
View more
Curated and popular this week
2Comments

Today's post, The Parable of Hemlock was originally published on 03 February 2008. A summary (taken from the LW wiki):

 

Socrates is a human, and humans, by definition, are mortal. So if you defined humans to not be mortal, would Socrates live forever?


Discuss the post here (rather than in the comments to the original post).

This post is part of the Rerunning the Sequences series, where we'll be going through Eliezer Yudkowsky's old posts in order so that people who are interested can (re-)read and discuss them. The previous post was The Parable of the Dagger, and you can use the sequence_reruns tag or rss feed to follow the rest of the series.

Sequence reruns are a community-driven effort. You can participate by re-reading the sequence post, discussing it here, posting the next day's sequence reruns post, or summarizing forthcoming articles on the wiki. Go here for more details, or to have meta discussions about the Rerunning the Sequences series.

Mentioned in
5[SEQ RERUN] Words as Hidden Inferences