I know this is banal, but ensure excellent administration.
Medical expertise is only relevant once you see the patient. Your ability to judge the evidence requires getting access to it; this means you need to be able to correctly send requests, get the data back, and keep all this attached to the correct patient.
Scheduling, filing and communication. Lacking these, medical expertise is meaningless. So get the best damn admin and IT you can possibly afford.
Very valid and good point(added). I briefly touched on it before too, but mostly had individual practitioners in mind than organized hospitals with administration and support. (India is moving towards a lot more of the organized hospitals model, but IT is non-existent, administration is most seat-in-the-ass jobs)
This is enough of a problem for small medical practices in the US that it outweighs a good bedside manner and confidence in the doctor's medical ability.
I am confident that this has a large effect on the success of an individual practice; it may fall under the general heading of business advice for the individual practitioner. Even for a single-doctor office, a good secretary and record system will be key to success.
This information comes chiefly from experience of and interviews with specialists (dermatology and gynaecology) in the US.
Be willing and able to judge, when a patient is better off with a specialist. Try to keep in touch with Doctors nearby and hopeful all types of specialists.
Normally the doctor recommendations tend to be relatively uncorrelated to the quality of the doctor that's refered. There a huge possibility to do better and actually gather data to make good recommendations.
If you have an intuitive sense that something is wrong with a patient but you don't know what's wrong, refer the patient to another doctor who might know more instead of simply ignoring that intuitive sense.
(I believe that it's useful advice based on the studies done on nurses)
Know the probabilities of fatal and adverse side-effects and update them with evidence(Bayes' theorem mentioned above)
Update on all relevant evidence, even if you don't have empirical data.
I would add:
Make decisions based on cost/benefit analysis, not simply probabilities. For example, low probability treatments can make perfect sense to try if they are low risk, low cost.
Know that the failure to reject a null hypothesis is not proof of the null hypothesis. It does not establish the null hypothesis. A failure to reject is simply an epistemological failure.
Hi all,
Please read the Disclaimers at the end of the post first, if you're easily offended.
Generalists(general medicine):
Specialists:
Basically the same skill sets as above. One difference is in the skill level and you should customize that as needed.
Some controversial ideas(Better use your common-sense before trying out):
Disclaimers:
* -- I understand this is difficult in Indian circumstances, but I've seen it being done manually(simply leaves of prescriptions organized alphabetically, link to dr.rathinavel) , so it's possible and worth the effort unless, you practice in area of highly migratory population.(for example rural vs urban areas).
**-- If you're trying to compete on availability for consultation, you'll need to be able to do this after being woken in the middle of the night.
I'm hoping to convert it into a rationalist skills for Doctors Wiki page, so please provide feedback, especially if you're practicing Doctors. If you don't want to post publicly email me(in profile) or comment on wordpress.