This is a special post for quick takes by leogao. Only they can create top-level comments. Comments here also appear on the Quick Takes page and All Posts page.
for people who are not very good at navigating social conventions, it is often easier to learn to be visibly weird than to learn to adapt to the social conventions.
this often works because there are some spaces where being visibly weird is tolerated, or even celebrated. in fact, from the perspective of an organization, it is good for your success if you are good at protecting weird people.
but from the perspective of an individual, leaning too hard into weirdness is possibly harmful. part of leaning into weirdness is intentional ignorance of normal conventions. this traps you in a local minimum where any progress on understanding normal conventions hurts your weirdness, but isn't enough to jump all the way to the basin of the normal mode of interaction.
(epistemic status: low confidence, just a hypothesis)
Perhaps I misunderstand your use of the phrase "intentionally ignorant" but I believe many cases of people who are seen to have acted with "integrity" are people who have been hyperaware and well informed of what normal social conventions are in a given environment and made deliberate choice not to adhere to them, not ignoring said conventions out of a lack of interest.
I also am not sure what you mean by "weird". I assume you mean any behavior which is not the normal convention of any randomly selected cohesive group of people, from a family, to a local so... (read more)
Pretty sure @Ronny Fernandez has opinions about this (in particular, I expect he disagrees that actively being visibly weird requires being ignorant of how to behave conventionally).
2MichaelDickens
I don't think I understand what "learn to be visibly weird" means, and how it differs from not following social conventions because you fail to understand them correctly.