This is a special post for quick takes by leogao. Only they can create top-level comments. Comments here also appear on the Quick Takes page and All Posts page.
the most valuable part of a social event is often not the part that is ostensibly the most important, but rather the gaps between the main parts.
at ML conferences, the headline keynotes and orals are usually the least useful part to go to; the random spontaneous hallway chats and dinners and afterparties are extremely valuable
when doing an activity with friends, the activity itself is often of secondary importance. talking on the way to the activity, or in the gaps between doing the activity, carry a lot of the value
at work, a lot of the best conversations happen outside of scheduled 1:1s and group meetings, but rather happen in spontaneous hallway or dinner groups
I do not find this to be the biggest value-contributor amongst my spontaneous conversations.
I don't have a good hypothesis for why spontaneous-ish conversations can end up being valuable to me so frequently. I have a vague intuition that it might be an expression of the same phenomenon that makes slack and playfulness in research and internet browsing very valuable for me.
24Alexander Gietelink Oldenziel
One of the directions im currently most excited about (modern control theory through algebraic analysis) I learned about while idly chitchatting with a colleague at lunch about old school cybernetics. We were both confused why it was such a big deal in the 50s and 60s then basically died.
A stranger at the table had overheard our conversation and immediately started ranting to us about the history of cybernetics and modern methods of control theory. Turns out that control theory has developed far beyond whay people did in the 60s but names, techniques, methods have changed and this guy was one of the world experts. I wouldn't have known to ask him because the guy's specialization on the face of it had nothing to do with control theory.