This is a special post for quick takes by leogao. Only they can create top-level comments. Comments here also appear on the Quick Takes page and All Posts page.
I honestly didn't think of that at all when making the market, because I think takeover-capability-level AGI by 2028 is extremely unlikely.
I care about this market insofar as it tells us whether (people believe) this is a good research direction. So obviously it's perfectly ok to resolve YES if it is solved and a lot of the work was done by AI assistants. If AI fooms and murders everyone before 2028 then this is obviously a bad portent for this research agenda, because it means we didn't get it done soon enough, and it's little comfort if the ASI solves interp after murdering or subjugating all of us. So that would resolve N/A, or maybe NO (not that it will matter whether your mana is returned to you after you are dead). If we solve alignment without interpretability and live in the glorious transhumanist utopia before 2028 and only manage to solve interpretability after takeoff, then... idk, I think the best option is to resolve N/A, because we also don't care about that when deciding whether today whether this is a good agenda.
Unfortunately, prediction markets need some bright red line somewhere to be resolvable. I encourage you to make a different market that captures the thing you care about.