riceissa | v1.6.0Mar 24th 2021 | (+19) | ||
Grognor | v1.5.0Feb 25th 2012 | (+39) | ||
Vladimir_Nesov | v1.4.0Oct 23rd 2009 | (+87/-90) | ||
PeerInfinity | v1.3.0Sep 8th 2009 | (+30/-30) | ||
Eliezer Yudkowsky | v1.2.0Aug 18th 2009 | (+24/-34) | ||
Eliezer Yudkowsky | v1.1.0Aug 18th 2009 | (+61/-176) | ||
Eliezer Yudkowsky | v1.0.0Aug 18th 2009 | (+1134) created page |
Michael Vassar has observed that conventional philosophers seem to be spectacularly bad at understanding that their intuitions are generated by cognitive algorithms. This may be why works of serious reductionism get written by Artificial Intelligence people instead of conventional philosophers; obvious cases in point being Gary Drescher and (ahem) Eliezer Yudkowsky.philosophers.
To dissolve a philosophical dilemma, it often suffices to understand the cognitive algorithm that generates the appearance of the dilemma - if you understand itthe algorithm in sufficient detail; it. It is not enough to say "An algorithm does it!" for- this might as well be magic.magic. It takes a detailed step-by-step walkthrough.
[Category:Concepts]
Michael Vassar has observed that conventional philosophers seem to be spectacularly bad at understanding that their intuitions are generated by cognitive algorithms - instead seeming simply to take them at face value.algorithms. This may be why many master-level reductionist works have beenof serious reductionism get written by Artificial Intelligence people rather than professionalinstead of conventional philosophers; obvious cases in point being Gary Drescher and (ahem) Eliezer Yudkowsky.
This is first explained in the sequence on words.
Our philosophical intuitions do not rain down on us as manna from heaven; they are generated by algorithms in the human brain. Our philosophical intuitions, indeed, are how these particular cognitive algorithms feel from the inside. To dissolve a philosophical dilemma, it often suffices to understand the cognitive algorithm that generates the appearance of the dilemma - if you understand it in sufficient detail; it is not enough to say "An algorithm does it!" for this might as well be magic. It takes a detailed step-by-step walkthrough.
Michael Vassar has observed that conventional philosophers seem to be spectacularly bad at understanding that their intuitions are generated by cognitive algorithms - instead seeming simply to take them at face value. This may be why many master-level reductionist works have been written by Artificial Intelligence people rather than professional philosophers; obvious cases in point being Gary Drescher and (ahem) Eliezer Yudkowsky.
This is first explained in the sequence on words.
[Category:Concepts]