| Ruby | v1.7.0Sep 25th 2020 | |||
| PeerInfinity | v1.6.0Sep 28th 2009 | (+52/-52) | ||
| PeerInfinity | v1.5.0Sep 21st 2009 | (+5/-5) | ||
| Vladimir_Nesov | v1.4.0Sep 11th 2009 | (-11) | ||
| steven0461 | v1.3.0Sep 11th 2009 | (+9/-9) | ||
| Vladimir_Nesov | v1.2.0Sep 10th 2009 | (+95/-72) | ||
| Zack_M_Davis | v1.1.0Sep 9th 2009 | (-1) /* See also */ remove spare bracket | ||
| Zack_M_Davis | v1.0.0Sep 9th 2009 | (+288) Created page; stub |
Almost any course of action invariably has both costs and benefits: optimizing for one value means trading off another. To show both faces of the issue, policy debates shouldn't appear one-sided.
Almost any course of action invariably has both costs and benefits: optimizing for one value,value means trading off another. To seeshow both faces of the issue, policy debates shouldn't appear one-sided.
Almost any course of action invariably has both costs and benefits: optimizing for one value, means trading off another. As a result,To see both faces of the issue, policy debates of complex issues should notshouldn't appear one-sided.
Almost any course of action invariably has both costs and benefits: optimizing for one value, means trading off another. As a result, policy debates of complex issues should not appear one-sided.
Blog posts
Blog postsPolicy Debates Should Not Appear One-Sided