If you're starting out (read: don't yet know what you're doing) then optimize for not getting injured. If you haven't done any weight lifting then you'll get results even if you start out slowly.
Optimize for likelihood of you not quitting. If you manage to stick to whatever plan you make you can always make adjustments where necessary. Risk of quitting is the #1 bottleneck.
Personally, I think you shouldn't look for supplements until you feel you're reached a ceiling with regular workouts. Starting with a strict diet (measure everything) is a good idea if you're serious about this.
Upvoted, but I disagree with the last sentence. Measuring everything doesn't fit too well with point #2, unless you have an obsessive personality, so adjust accordingly.
Upvoted, but I disagree with the last sentence. Measuring everything doesn't fit too well with point #2, unless you have an obsessive personality, so adjust accordingly.
Agree and add that it's also dangerous (well, distinctly suboptimal but not life threatening) if you are keeping yourself to a strict measured diet. Your food consuption will be increasing rather dramatically with the new exercise load, particularly given the new need to grow muscle mass. It's hard to predict the changes and it is unlikely that your strict routine is going to be better calibrated than just eating when you are hungry or erring on the side of eating more (protien) than seems natural.
By far my biggest piece of advice would be to not worry at all about optimizing anything until you've first gotten into the habit of regular work outs, and actually enjoy it. Only then should you start optimizing in other ways. The biggest obstacle is always sticking with it.
For me personally this means I lift while watching the Daily Show and Colbert online. Regular 4-days a week at 45 min each day, and it's enjoyable. I can change the time of day I work out, or even what days of the week I do it, but I have to get in some reps to keep up on the comedy-news. Find something you want to do regularly to tie it to.
Also, stretch plenty, before during and after. Don't neglect your neck.
By far my biggest piece of advice would be to not worry at all about optimizing anything until you've first gotten into the habit of regular work outs, and actually enjoy it. Only then should you start optimizing in other ways. The biggest obstacle is always sticking with it.
Completely agree. I've recently started weight training rather than just going to the gym for cardio, and I actually enjoy it. Unfortunately I'm moving to somewhere with less convenient gym access in a couple of weeks. It sounds like you have a home setup - any recommendations for low-cost equipment?
I've actually only been at this a few months, so all I have is some dumbbells. Kinda surprising the range of exercise that I've been able to get out of them. I'm considering getting more equipment, but I don't have a lot of room to store it. If I do I'll probably start with craigslist.
How to structure work-outs. Should I lift as much weight as possible or do more repetitions at lower weights?
High weight, no doubt. Aim for ~8 Reps. Focus on exercises that use multiple muscle groups. ie. Squats, bench press, lat pull down.
How should I trade off frequency of gym visits against length of those visits?
Low frequency. Give yourself time to recover. Don't make the length too high either. The sets you do should be intense. You should be as exhausted as possible after you finish them.
What supplements should I take?
'Roids, if you are optimizing for physique (but probably not if you are optimizing for, well, life in general). More sensibly supplement protein. Play with some creatine if you are enthusiastic, particularly if you are into the appearance boost.
I'm surprised you mentioned steroids before creatine. Steroids are well-established to be bad for you, whereas creatine has undergone a moderate amount of testing with no evidence of negative side-effects (though it hasn't been studied long enough for long-term side effects to be ruled out). I haven't done a ton of research, but here are my main sources:
"ISSN exercise & sport nutrition review: research & recommendations", Kreider et al. "Effects of creatine supplementation on performance and training adaptations", Richard Kreider
I'm surprised you mentioned steroids before creatine.
You wouldn't be if you knew me. You'd be picturing the twinkle in my eye as I gave the literal answer to the question before acknowledging the impracticality and giving safe but far less effective alternative.
What's wrong with roids?
Just some tradeoffs to be made. Typical side effects are a mix of:
Depending on the type you buy you can mix and match from that set as well as trading off effectiveness and price.
Book recommendations:
Answering your questions:
1) It doesn't matter that much what you do, as long as you stick with the basic, multi-joint movements (see below); what's more important is that you do it consistently for a long period of time (i.e., years), and you train progressively harder as you make progress. That said, you need to avoid injury. Training with weights near your one-rep max is riskier as a beginner, especially without a coach. I like the set/rep progression laid out in the 5/3/1 book listed above. I've made good progress on it after doing regular weight training for 15 years; it's difficult to make progress at that "training age", so it should work even better for a beginner.
2) In general, you should strength train at least twice a week but not more than four times a week. This does not include conditioning or mobility training, which you should also do.
3) Don't bother with supplements. Spend your money on a clean diet with lots of protein and you'll be fine. Since you probably won't take this advice: creatine monohydrate seems to have the most evidence in favor of its efficacy, but the effect is still relatively small and seems to vary between users. I haven't noticed a difference when using it.
Remember that there are only a handful of great movements: squat, deadlift, bench press, overhead press, pull-up, push-up, dips, rows, power cleans. Consider the barbell, dumbbell, and bodyweight variations of these and you will have plenty to do without doing a bunch of exotic isolation work.
If in doubt:
Monday: Squat, Bench, Pullups Thursday: Deadlift, Overhead Press, Rows
Three other days: run hills, steep and hard. Two days: rest
My advice is get the book Starting Strength by Mark Rippetoe. He:
I was skeptical of the proposed program because I had already been lifting for a couple years, and I found a lot of the suggestions unintuitive. However, after two independent sources told me it was a good program, I started doing it. After 8 weeks I was able to bench press 77.5kg, whereas before I had been stuck for a long time around 70kg. All of the lifts also felt more comfortable / safer than they had before (due to changing my form to match the guidelines in the book).
There is also a Starting Strength Wiki that has lots of good videos / summaries of the information in the book (but the book is way more details / useful, at least for having proper lifting form).
Perhaps you should read a book written by experts in the field. Fahey, Insel and Roth's Fit & Well: Core Concepts and Labs in Physical Fitness and Wellness seems to be one of those.
The best research on work-out composition I've found so far is this survey: http://www.motleyhealth.com/strength/weight-training-intensity-or-volume-for-bigger-muscles (links to the studies at the bottom).
This study supports the use of protein supplements but falsifies the hypothesis that timing matters: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19478342
I found reddit's r/fitness 'fittit; a useful resource when I started exercising more seriously a few months ago. Has the beenfit of being gnerally well researched and tested, but not trying to sell you anything (which seemed the case with most obvious fitness sites). Heres a link ot their general faq which is pretty good, http://www.reddit.com/help/faqs/Fitness#Weights
I haven't bothered to keep track of sources, but everything seems to point towards the same conclusions.
Getting sore is a decent indication of how stressed your muscles were.
Studies have shown that more than 1 set doesn't help, but that's only because they use people that haven't been weight lifting and their muscles get plenty torn up after 1 set. More sets can help if you've been doing it for a while.
More reps doesn't build strength so much, but will add more energy storage to your muscles so that you can do more reps (bodybuilders optimize towards building muscle in this way)
You can hit diminishing returns after lifting one muscle too much in one sitting or too soon after lifting, so just use soreness as a rule of thumb and don't exceed either of those bounds.
We're already almost full of creatine (unless you're a vegetarian...)
To clarify that: fish is sufficient. One does not have to eat land animals.
starting strength.
drink milk.
by the time you stop getting gains through this method you will be in amazing shape.
Not sure I understand "starting strength". Do you mean that when starting strength training one should just drink milk?
Drink milk? Do you mean drink milk and also lift heavy shit and put it down again in the same place lots of times?
It seems to me there is pretty solid consensus on sites like bodybuildingforums about how to start lifting. Read Starting Strength, eat protein. Most of all, experiment with work out schedules that work for you.
I recommend articles by Chad Waterbury and Dan John to start, which you can find on www.t-nation.com (which is a quality resource in general). Dan John tends to recommend simple, effective strategies, and Waterbury writes a lot addressing your first and second questions.
A great place to start, this article by Mark Rippetoe: http://www.t-nation.com/free_online_article/most_recent/most_lifters_are_still_beginners
Eric Cressey and Christian Thibaudeau write great stuff, if you're into a more complicated approach.
Also I agree strongly with Zed's point 2.
I agree with Zed's point 3. about supplements sort of. I think the exceptions are (1) "peri-workout nutrition" about which there are many complex strategies but you can keep it simple, say a whey protein & gatorade shake before or after (or both) your workouts, and (2) things often lacking in a modern diet or lifestyle: fish oil (or some other way to get omega 3) and vitamin D seem to be the most frequent recommendations.
1) Optimize for not getting injured by doing bodyweight exercises.
2) Do slow pull ups. Graduate to pull ups with weighted backpacks, fewer fingers, etc.
3) Run up stairs. Real stairs (or hills).
Most of the advice here is really bad. First, any exercise will increase your fitness if you haven't been exercising. After that, what to do depends on what you want to achieve.
Don't try to increase your strength and endurance at the same time. There is pretty strong evidence that exercising for one tend to block increases in the other. If you want to increase both, exercise for strength then when you reach your goals there, switch to endurance training. The one time you may want to do intermediate weights and reps (the maximum weight you can lift for 10-12 times per set) is if you are trying to "bulk up", to add muscle mass to your body.
For strength exercise hard and less frequently. Two or three sessions per week, three exercises per session (best combination is bench press, deadlift or squats, and bent rows or chins), with the most weight you can handle for five repetitions, and do 5 sets, spaced at least three minutes apart, of each exercise.
That is, for example, 5 bench presses, rest 3-4 minutes, bench presses, wait, BPs, rest, BPs, rest, BPs, rest, Squats, rest, and so on. The best gains will happen doing this three times a week.
Once you reach your strength goals, the simplest method to increase your endurance is to maintain the weights and start increasing your reps. Switch to more repetitions per set, but fewer sets and with shorter rest periods between them. You can also begin adding minor exercises, such as curls and calf raises and so on since you want to exercise for longer periods now. Also, for endurance, you should increase the days you are exercising to 5 or 6 days per week with a "split shift", doing chest and shoulders one day, arms and upper back the next, and lower body on the third, then repeating.
You do not need supplements if you are eating a reasonable diet.
Getting sore is a decent indication of how stressed your muscles were.
No, getting sore is an indication of your "total lift" - that is the sum of the amount lifted and how many times. For example, deadlifting 300 pounds 6 times gives a total for that set of 1800 pounds. The greater your total lift, the more likely you are to be sore; and since you can lift 70% of your maximum lift far more times than 90%, you will usually get more sore doing endurance training than doing strength.
Brian Sharkey, Fitness and Health (the earlier editions were titled Physiology of Fitness)
Jim Johnson, Treat Your Own Rotator Cuff and Treat Your Own Knees
and quite a few bodybuilding and strength training books over the decades.
No, getting sore is an indication of your "total lift" - that is the sum of the amount lifted and how many times. For example, deadlifting 300 pounds 6 times gives a total for that set of 1800 pounds. The greater your total lift, the more likely you are to be sore; and since you can lift 70% of your maximum lift far more times than 90%, you will usually get more sore doing endurance training than doing strength.
This is trivially easy to falsify. Try lifting your absolute maximum once, and see how sore you are immediately after and the next day. Try lifting a tenth of that twelve times, and see how sore you are after that. If you don't bring your muscles to fatigue, you're not going to be sore even if you rack up a total lift much larger than you would in an ordinary workout.
That said, once you've gotten your body acclimated to regular weight training, you'll become sore much less easily, and this doesn't mean that you're not getting the benefits from the weight training
I agree with your last paragraph completely, but I guess I wasn't clear about the "total lift" and soreness bit. I didn't mean a fixed amount of weight, I meant doing your maximum reps with a particular weight - the maximum number of times I can lift 70 pounds is a lot more than 5 times the number of times I can lift 350 pounds. In fact it is more than 10 times as much- 70 pounds by 50 reps (3500 pounds total) versus 350 pounds by 4 reps (1400 pounds total). And the former leaves a lot more aches than the latter.
I agree with your last paragraph completely, but I guess I wasn't clear about the "total lift" and soreness bit. I didn't mean a fixed amount of weight, I meant doing your maximum reps with a particular weight - the maximum number of times I can lift 70 pounds is a lot more than 5 times the number of times I can lift 350 pounds. In fact it is more than 10 times as much- 70 pounds by 50 reps (3500 pounds total) versus 350 pounds by 4 reps (1400 pounds total). And the former leaves a lot more aches than the latter.
Well, if you exercise until you can't lift 50 pounds for another rep, you've fatigued your muscles more (deteriorated more myofibrils) than if you exercise until you can't lift 180 pounds for another rep, although you're not going to build your fast twitch muscles as much only doing low weight.
Well, if you exercise until you can't lift 50 pounds for another rep, you've fatigued your muscles more (deteriorated more myofibrils) than if you exercise until you can't lift 180 pounds for another rep, although you're not going to build your fast twitch muscles as much only doing low weight.
... and you are quite possibly just overtraining, leaving yourself worse off than before!
Although I've never used it myself, I know guys who swear by the method of working with high weights to depletion, then lower weights, then lower, until they fail to lift a fraction of their maximum. Whether your muscles can recover from that in a timely manner depends largely on the kind of condition you're already in, I wouldn't suggest trying it if you're not already a veteran.
Although I've never used it myself, I know guys who swear by the method of working with high weights to depletion, then lower weights, then lower, until they fail to lift a fraction of their maximum.
I have tried it and it is a lot of fun! It can work too... if done in the right balance.
I merely affirmed what you said and pointed out that turning the dial one step further into the 'high amount of fatigue' end of the spectrum can not only reduce strength gains but outright reduce them. Overtraining really does make you weaker. Not to mention chronically tired. (I've tried that too.)
Whether your muscles can recover from that in a timely manner depends largely on the kind of condition you're already in, I wouldn't suggest trying it if you're not already a veteran.
Some would say that you need more recovery time if you are already well built than if you are less so. We can improve our ability to restore muscles via training but not as much as we can increase the amount of muscle mass that needs to be restored.
It is well established that you cannot really build endurance and strength at the same time. But as I wrote, it depends on what you want to achieve. I am reasonably, but not especially, strong, but when working at landscaping when I was younger I could work people who were substantially stronger than me into the ground. And endurance is more correlated with health than is strength, except for some increase in resistance to injury with increasing strength.
It is well established that you cannot really build endurance and strength at the same time.
WTF? No it isn't. It's hard to build strength without building endurance. Sure, strength training isn't optimal for endurance building but it's far from terrible. (Although I suppose it holds for a really stretched definition of 'really'.)
In this thread: massive amounts of other-optimization.
Dear OP: As with every other health-related, low-evidence area: experiment, record results, update on data.
In this thread: massive amounts of other-optimization.
WTF? That was the point.
Dear OP: As with every other health-related, low-evidence area: experiment, record results, update on data.
This isn't a low evidence area. There is an enormous amount of evidence relative to things-we-have-evidence-about. I do recommend recording results and updating on data (of course). There are some for whom general purpose routines will not work as well but they are the place to start. Doing what works for most other individuals of your species is hardly a bad heuristic!
This isn't a low evidence area.
Perhaps I should have said it's a low signal-to-noise area. Look at this thread! How is anyone supposed to cope with this mountain of imperatives wrapped in anecdotal evidence and fitness guru personality cults?
Doing what works for most other individuals of your species is hardly a bad heuristic!
It's the "most other individuals of your species" part that I contest. Any valid results tend to be buried under mountains of misinformation.
I'm looking for resources on effective weight training for the purpose of physique building. It's an area with a particularly poor signal to noise ratio so I would value pointers from other rationalists. The kinds of questions I would like to answer are:
Edit: I'm vegetarian, and I now realise this is rather important to answers to point three. So far the only supplement I've been taking is soy protein.