Is it possible to get a stable 10h/wk remote SWE job as an early career decently smart person? Would like to meditate 6h/day. Current idea is to start a lifestyle SaaS business.
Attention conservation notice: Not answering your question, instead making a different suggestion.
If you're willing to commit to meditating 12-18 hours/day (so 2×-3× your current goal), you could also go on a long-term meditation retreat. Panditarama Lumbini in Nepal offers long-term retreats for whatever one can afford.
(I haven't gone there, and they have a very harsh schedule with some sleep deprivation.)
Appreciate the suggestion!
I’ve had coffee chats with three people who like that retreat center. I like retreats, and I did a 8h/day home retreat last summer. Have seriously considered Panditarama but it is a big time investment and career break especially early career. And also I worry it would be hard on my body sitting so long and hard, and that Mahasi practice risks being destabilizing. May still do one though. Probably not while getting a business off the ground, but maybe when there is in between time or room for a small sabbatical.
Do you have any thoughts on career circumstances where I could make income for the 9 months I wouldn’t be on retreat?
Unfortunately not :-/ SWE jobmarket seems tough right now, maybe less so in old programming languages like COBOL? But that's banks so they may require a full-time position.
Don’t do this. Meditating 6 hours a day is excessive, unless you derive some marginal value that I don’t understand from it.
Epistemic status: spent 30min cleaning up some notes from my Obsidian I jotted down yesterday. This ontology is rough and a bit illegible but potentially useful for narrowing down the actual use cases of memory systems.
Inspired by @Saul Munn's recent short form: Active Recall and Spaced Repetition are Different Things. The concepts of active recall and spaced repetition apply pretty well here, but I saw Saul's post after writing most of the text below.
Roughly, there are types of knowledge in domains (recalling from Scott Young's Ultralearning, I might be slightly off):
I think spaced repetition systems are useful for three types of domains based on the nature of the cues in the domains:
Combining the two frameworks above, Anki is useful for:
Accordingly, memory systems may not be useful for:
An AI content X/Twitter account with nearly 100k followers blocked me, and I got a couple of disapproving replies for pointing out that the account was AI-generated. I quote-tweeted the account mostly to share a useful Chrome Extension that I've been using the detect AI content, but I was surprised that there was a negative reaction in the form of a few replies pointing out the account was AI-generated. I am neither pro- nor anti-AI accounts, but being aware of the nature of the content seems to be useful.
Would be curious to hear others' thoughts on the phenomenon.
Original Tweet: https://x.com/parconley/status/2000064102543376413
Can you clarify which phenomenon you're curious about? Blocking people who post anything that disrupts the desired messaging is as old as the ability to block people. AI-generated content is newer, but still not new. Optimizing for "engagement" rather than information or discussion is pre-internet (a LOT of publications, but not all).
Large AI accounts and multiple people (or other AI accounts) being adversarial when I pointed out that it is AI is the phenomenon.
Bot farms have been around for awhile. Use of AI for this purpose (along with all other, more useful purposes) has been massively increasing over the last few years, and a LOT in the last 6 months.
Personally, I'd rather have someone point out the errors or misleading statements in the post, rather than worrying about whether it's AI or just a content farm of low-paid humans or someone with too much time and a bad agenda. But a lot of folks think "AI generated" is bad, and react as such (some by stopping following such accounts, some by blocking the complainers).