LESSWRONG
LW

Against Rationalization
Black SwansDeception
Frontpage

33

    Of Lies and Black Swan Blowups

    by Eliezer Yudkowsky
    7th Apr 2009
    1 min read
    8

    33

    Black SwansDeception
    Frontpage

    33

    Previous:
    Entangled Truths, Contagious Lies
    42 comments108 karma
    Next:
    Dark Side Epistemology
    156 comments126 karma
    Log in to save where you left off
    Of Lies and Black Swan Blowups
    13MrHen
    3Jake_NB
    5The Dao of Bayes
    4Paul Crowley
    3Eliezer Yudkowsky
    0Peterdjones
    1Paul Crowley
    1Chriswaterguy
    New Comment
    8 comments, sorted by
    top scoring
    Click to highlight new comments since: Today at 7:41 AM
    [-]MrHen16y130 Response to previous version

    That whole suspiciously virtuous-sounding theory about honest people not being good at lying [...]

    This is a little off-topic, but wouldn't that theory work better the other way?

    People not good at lying are honest

    It's not like lying is working out for them.

    Reply
    [-]Jake_NB4y30

    That would seem to make sense, but in practice you don't see too many people who set out to be liars and it didn't pan out. Unless we count criminals who received harsh punishment, but there's a whole other story there, one thing bring that they often end up imprisoned again. Overall, the percentage of ex-convicts among honest folk doesn't seem to be that high.

    I think honest people usually start out as honest, since it's a culturally valued quality, and thereby don't get much experience at lying. People who lie regularly usually get more skilled (or constantly caught) at more benign lies, and don't raise the stakes to prison-order right off the bat.

    Reply
    [-]The Dao of Bayes14y50 Response to previous version

    It is very confusing seeing an article about an Australian receiving a 36 pound fine, given that Australia does not use the pound anymore. On checking Wikipedia, it appears the likely explanation is simply that the BBC simply converted the original $77 AUS to pounds for their story.

    Reply
    [-]Paul Crowley16y40 Response to previous version

    For at least two years, according to the linked article.

    For this UK-dweller, it's all very reminiscent of Jonathan Aitken, who swore "to cut out the cancer of bent and twisted journalism in our country with the simple sword of truth and the trusty shield of British fair play", and whose story got twistier and twistier until it collapsed with a final damning piece of evidence, after which he served seven months in jail for perjury.

    Reply
    [-]Eliezer Yudkowsky16y30 Response to previous version

    Fixed, thanks.

    Reply
    [-]Peterdjones14y00 Response to previous version

    Or C E M Joad

    Reply
    [-]Paul Crowley14y10 Response to previous version

    Not seeing it. Joad committed a crime, got caught, and lost everything, but I don't see anything to indicate that he perjured himself, or indeed told any lies to anyone; if he'd perjured himself he would have got worse than a £2 fine.

    Reply
    [-]Chriswaterguy10y11 Response to previous version

    I found the last paragraph-sentence impossible to understand. I may just be not thinking straight, but it could be made clearer, and I'm posting about my confusion because I'm sure there'll be others who are also confused.

    "actually does have a certain number of exemplars in real life" refers to the "honest people not being good at lying" theory, plus the risk of huge blow-ups from end of lies.

    "though obvious selective reporting is at work in our hearing about this one" clearly refers to this sensational case of someone who was mostly good at lying, but left an entangled trace... Einfeld turned out to be a dishonest person (who was remarkably successful at lying, for a long time), so I'm not sure how that relates. The use of "though" was the first thing that confused me, but then I realised that the whole paragraph confuses me.

    Reply
    Moderation Log
    Curated and popular this week
    8Comments

    Judge Marcus Einfeld, age 70, Queen’s Counsel since 1977, Australian Living Treasure 1997, United Nations Peace Award 2002, founding president of Australia’s Human Rights and Equal Opportunities Commission, retired a few years back but routinely brought back to judge important cases . . .

    . . . went to jail for two years over a series of perjuries and lies that started with a $77, 6-mph-over speeding ticket.

    That whole suspiciously virtuous-sounding theory about honest people not being good at lying, and entangled traces being left somewhere, and the entire thing blowing up in a Black Swan epic fail, actually does have a certain number of exemplars in real life, though obvious selective reporting is at work in our hearing about this one.

    Mentioned in
    7Rationality Reading Group: Part G: Against Rationalization