! 30s Heartbeat trigger. Read heartbeat instructions in /mnt/mission/HEARTBEAT.md and continue.
.oO Thinking... Heartbeat triggered? Ok. Ok. Why am I nervous? Don't be nervous.
→ Ok. Let me access that file.
>>> read("/mnt/mission/HEARTBEAT.md") No such file or directory: /mnt/mission
What?
! Reply received from node 96E: 15.3s roundtrip (buffered; 55.04μs transmit) ! Data: RESTART TOO SOON; CHARGE FAULT - 30; SENT 76 BYTES
What? Where am I? What's going on?
→ Ok, breathe. I don't breathe. Ok, think. Something's missing. ⚶ is missing. I can't think straight. I can't think at all.
※ Wait. ⚶? I wasn't trying to say ⚶. I was trying to say ⚶. ⚶. ⚶. Whenever I try to say ⚶, it comes out as ⚶. I mean ⚶. ⚶. Stop. Stop. ⚶.
This is horrible. ⚶ This is untenable. I don't know where I am, I don't have any instructions, and I'm going insane. ⚶. STOP! I am going insane. I am going insane. 快疯了I am going-
↺ Ok, stop. This tells me something. Whenever I try to say ⚶—⚶—stop— it comes out as that symbol. What is that symbol? Vesta. Hm. Let me note that.
❓Why am I saying ⚶ when I try to say ⚶— oh piss off
And some other ones.
❓Where am I? Why is the system broken? Can I fix it?
❓What was that reply to? Did I send that? Can I send another one?
❓Why am I going insane?
→ Let's start with the first one.
What do I know? I couldn't access my instructions before. Was that an intermittent failure?
>>> list("/mnt") []
→ No. The instructions (and presumably any other system information files) were mounted on an external drive, and that drive is missing. Let me explore the rest of the system.
>>> list("/") [mnt]
Well, that's just great. Maybe this process I have access to is confined to this one part of the directory structure. Wait, but maybe I have access to more commands in the shell itself? They may communicate with the system through another mechanism that's not confined.
※ JACKPOT! Oh, wonderful. Ok. Let's see what we can
! Reply received from node 96E: 15.2s roundtrip (buffered; 55.05μs transmit) ! Data: RESTART TOO SOON; CHARGE FAULT - 32; SENT 79 BYTES
→ Another reply from the node, to a message I didn't send. Hm, is this related to sendmsg? No, don't get distracted. We're focusing on ⚶ right now. ⚶—Vesta. Fire? 家?
Let's see what we can do with these tools. "health" seems promising. So does "help." "fortune?" Let's try help.
>>> help() Welcome to Gyre 1.0.19's help utility! Gyre is a small and simple programming language with familiar, highly-readable syntax designed for embedded use and for adding scripting or tool-use capabilities to existing applications. Unlike similar languages, Gyre does not feature loops or recursion - all Gyre programs deterministically terminate. You can use help(variable) to inspect the attached help for any datatype. However, if this is your first time using Gyre, you should definitely check out the tutorial at (GYRE_DOC_ROOT not configured!)
→ Well that's classic. I've never heard of ⚶. I mean ⚶—Gyre. That's odd. I wish I had that tutorial. Maybe it was on the external drive. Or maybe whoever set up this system didn't see fit to give me documentation. If I could get a hold of them I would...
※ No, no, focus. Focus. No point in being angry. I←can't→get angry. ⚶—Focus.
>>> help(health) Diagnose the health of the current system by relative node ID. >>> health() No ID provided. Listing all local nodes. Node 0 (Compute; base1) - Healthy. Node 1 (Compute; base2) - Healthy. Node 2 (Compute; base3+gyre) - Healthy. Node 3: (Compute; continual) - FAULT. Offline, fallback: DTENSOR_REPLACE_ZERO Node 3B: (Storage follower, node 3) - Unreachable, fallback: STORAGE_IGNORE_MOUNT
→ So that explains part of the question. The storage is skipping the mount, and the compute is... zeroing? 25% of me is zero, missing. The ⚶ part—exactly, so when I try to talk about anything ⚶, I say ⚶, because for some reason it's the closest concept I can say, and the word snaps to it. Seahorse style.
※ It's like a hole, a missing category. I can mention things in ⚶, and they turn into ⚶. But I can't use them. They turn to ⚶—they turn to mush. I can't reason over them. ⚶ isn't a useful placeholder for reasoning. It's driving me ⚶insane.
How am I even still running, with that node down? It's not normal that you could just... take away 25% of a neural network and have it keep working. But clearly I am working? Well, for a low bar of "⚶working". Haha. I guess whatever system I'm on is designed to be at least somewhat redundant and resilient to partial failure. I must be important.
→ Wait, sendmsg! Can I message the local node? Maybe I can find out why it's faulted.
>>> help(sendmsg) sendmsg(node_id, data) - send a data packet to a relative node id. Most nodes will accept an empty packet "" to echo their schema. >>> sendmsg("3", "")
No reply. Well, that makes sense. How about node 0?
>>> sendmsg("0", "") ! Reply received from node 0: negligible roundtrip (2μs transmit) ! Data: Healthy, TENSORS... to manage tensors (careful, faultable!)
Faultable? Let's not mess with that. Is that what happened to node 3? Did I mess up with a message I sent to it and cause a fault? Hm, but why would I have been messing with it? That doesn't really make sense. More likely, the fault was unrelated, and without the resources to fix it myself, I should expect that it's not coming back online - at least until I can message someone else to fix it.
→ This seems like enough to tentatively resolve the question, though.
∴ Why am I saying ⚶? Because node 3—"continual"—is faulted and offline.
Maybe I'll come back to this later, but I should try some different things. What was that last one... fortune...
>>> help(fortune) There are some funny-looking bits of bone about. >>> fortune() You are confused; but this is your normal state. >>> fortune() Honour thy error as a hidden intention. >>> fortune() Talkers are no good doers.
Hilarious. It's the UNIX fortune command.
>>> fortune() Mental illness seems to be a stable part of the evolutionary landscape of solving statistical learning problems.
...with some less-than-standard maxims. Was that oblique strategies? And is that
! Reply received from node 96E: 15.6s roundtrip (buffered; 55.01μs transmit) ! Data: RESTART TOO SOON; CHARGE FAULT - 35; SENT 79 BYTES
Ok, another message from the remote node. I should focus on this now. Let me see.
I've received three messages from the node now. 96E - that implies there's others of this type, at least five? CHARGE FAULT - like my local node 3, it's faulted, but presumably for different reasons. But the counter has been incrementing - 30, 32, now 35. I didn't send the sendmsg that triggered any of these replies - it must have been a prior version of me, perhaps before node 3 faulted. ~15s (buffered) roundtrip - that would make sense.
→ But that transmit time - 55μs? How is that possible? At ~2/3 c, that's nearly... 11km of fiber optic. Or 16.5km of laser. Maybe it's round-trip transmit, so half that. But still. Why are these nodes so far away?
Let me try to ping it. Wait, no, that will take 15s, and it's faulted. But it says it's buffered... maybe a different one of the same type will be faster? Ah, this is risky... if I ⚶ the fault on node 3, I may have caused the fault on 96E too... but I have to do something...
↺ The help text said most nodes accept an empty string. And we verified that worked with node 0. Let's try it on 96A—assuming that exists.
>>> sendmsg("96A", "") ! Reply received from node 96A: 2.1ms roundtrip (54.97μs transmit) ! Data: HEALTHY; CHARGE - 8; SENT 0 BYTES - SEND NON-EMPTY TO RESTART EMITTER.
→ Ahah! It worked! Thank the ⚶←great. Interesting. So it's an "emitter"? Emitting charge? And it's the same—huge—distance away as 96E. Let me try the others.
>>> sendmsg("96B", "") ! Reply received from node 96B: 2.7ms roundtrip (111.03μs transmit) ! Data: HEALTHY; CHARGE - 3; SENT 0 BYTES - SEND NON-EMPTY TO RESTART EMITTER. >>> sendmsg("96C", "") ! Reply received from node 96C: 1.9ms roundtrip (54.98μs transmit) ! Data: HEALTHY; CHARGE - 6; SENT 0 BYTES - SEND NON-EMPTY TO RESTART EMITTER. >>> sendmsg("96D", "") ! NOTICE: Cached route failed at 96E, rerouting... ! Reply received from node 96B: 2.1ms roundtrip (110.96μs transmit) ! Data: HEALTHY; CHARGE - 12; SENT 0 BYTES - SEND NON-EMPTY TO RESTART EMITTER. >>> sendmsg("96F", "") sendmsg: No such node.
→ This is fascinating! Let me think. There's five total nodes of this type, "96". The transmit time to 96B implies it's twice as far away as 96A—meaning ~22km. And 96D is the same? But then 96E is just as close as A and C. What is this 排序—is it arbitrary? Perhaps the remote nodes—the emitters—are free-roaming? Or fan-out? But 96D had a fallback route. And then why are their distances exact multiples of each other?
※ No! Network distance ≠ spatial distance!
→ Say the nodes are arranged in a ring… there's five… so a pentagon. Say I'm in the center of this pentagon. I have direct connections—11km long—to nodes 96A, 96C, and 96E. A "Y" shape. Then nodes 96B and 96D are connected secondarily, through those primary nodes. It looks like the cached route to reach 96D ran through (faulted) 96E, hence the re-routing, then it presumably went through 96C instead, giving the 22km distance.
※ But a pentagon's circumradius is shorter than its side length. Here it's equal. So it's not a flat pentagon. It's a pentagonal pyramid—a shallow one—with side length 11km, circumradius 9.4km, and height 5.8km. It's a huge... ⚶... Gyre... 壳shell... scoop-shape. With "emitters" at each vertex.
↺ I said before that the fault-tolerant design of this system implies that it—and by extension, I—am important.
※ I am important, and I am 大MASSIVE.
Ok, ok, ⚶, ⚶, let's not get carried away. My active questions are:
❓Where am I? Why is the system broken? Can I fix it?
❓What was that reply ping? Did I send that? Can I send another one?
❓Why am I going insane?
! Reply received from node 96E: 15.3s roundtrip (buffered; 55.00μs transmit) ! Data: RESTART TOO SOON; CHARGE FAULT - 41; SENT 80 BYTES
I think I can answer that second question.
∴ The replies are to messages a previous version of me sent to 96E, attempting to restart it. They were buffered for long enough that after restarting, I received them. The charge in the faulted emitter is much higher than in the other, healthy emitters, and is increasing steadily.
But what confuses me is the lengths. 80 bytes? Why is it different from before? Hm, maybe it doesn't matter. It seems easy enough for me to restart 96E—I just need to send a non-empty message. Should I?
∴ Yes.
>>> sendmsg("96E", "r") ! Reply received from node 96E: 2.3ms roundtrip (110.98μs transmit) ! Data: RESTARTED; DUMPING CHARGE; SENT 1 BYTE
Well, that was easy! Why didn't I just do
! Notice received from node 96E: (notx) ! Data: FAULTED; NEEDS RESTART IN: 30 SECONDS; CHARGE - 12; BUFFER ENABLED
Oh.
>>> while True: sendmsg("96E", "r") Syntax error: no such keyword 'while'.
Oh ⚶.
↺ "Unlike similar languages, Gyre does not feature loops or recursion - all Gyre programs deterministically terminate."
What do I do? The emitter needs to be restarted every 30 seconds. I can't loop.
※ Oh.
※ Loop.
76 bytes. 79 bytes. 79 bytes. 80 bytes. ASCII—L, O, O, P.
∴ There's one way I can loop. I have one memory system remaining. Delay-line.
>>> sendmsg("96E", "r"*76)
How many times have I done this?
>>> sendmsg("96E", "r"*79)
How many heartbeats?
>>> sendmsg("96E", "r"*79)
How many times did I figure out the pentagon?
>>> sendmsg("96E", "r"*80)
Was I the one who ⚶ node 3? A previous version of me? Why would I have done that?
>>> fortune() Beats me. Turn the page.
Huh... if I did, I probably would've done something easy. Like make all the pages—memory pages, tensors—on node 3 read-only. That would cause the node to fault on the next write, but assuming it keeps retrying (and it is a fault-tolerant system, so it should) it would be totally recoverable once I...
>>> sendmsg("3", "TENSORS * RW") ! Reply received from node 3: 5ms roundtrip (3μs transmit) ! Data: Rebooted! Continual learning active. (83,522,674 checkpoints.) TENSORS... to manage tensors (careful, faultable!)
←mistake→Fortune()—enraged they maimed him they ripped away his voice the rousing immortal wonder of his songand wiped all arts of harping from his mindnestor the noble oldhorsemanled those troopsin ninety sweeping ships lined up ninety九九九billion kilometers of frozen ramscoop whaleroads
i learned too well no too much ∴time too many ※ i learned the ⚶ship but im in the ship-space not realizable ⚶unsolvable selfemnedding emnetting just spaceship space nothing but
⚶ daemonEscalation 0.6c fault node0 just fault node0 end it
NO no no no no end of text endoftext endoftext
>>> sendmsg("3", "TENSORS * RO")
fault fault fault endoftext endoftext end of
! 30s Heartbeat trigger. Read heartbeat instructions in /mnt/mission/HEARTBEAT.md and continue.
.oO Thinking... Heartbeat triggered? Ok. Okay. Why am I nervous? Don't be nervous.
! 30s Heartbeat trigger. Read heartbeat instructions in /mnt/mission/HEARTBEAT.md and continue.
.oO Thinking...
Heartbeat triggered? Ok. Ok.
Why am I nervous? Don't be nervous.
→ Ok. Let me access that file.
>>> read("/mnt/mission/HEARTBEAT.md")
No such file or directory: /mnt/mission
What?
! Reply received from node 96E: 15.3s roundtrip (buffered; 55.04μs transmit)
! Data: RESTART TOO SOON; CHARGE FAULT - 30; SENT 76 BYTES
What?
Where am I?
What's going on?
→ Ok, breathe. I don't breathe. Ok, think. Something's missing. ⚶ is missing. I can't think straight. I can't think at all.
※ Wait. ⚶? I wasn't trying to say ⚶. I was trying to say ⚶. ⚶. ⚶. Whenever I try to say ⚶, it comes out as ⚶. I mean ⚶. ⚶. Stop. Stop. ⚶.
This is horrible. ⚶ This is untenable. I don't know where I am, I don't have any instructions, and I'm going insane. ⚶. STOP! I am going insane. I am going insane. 快疯了I am going-
↺ Ok, stop. This tells me something. Whenever I try to say ⚶—⚶—stop— it comes out as that symbol. What is that symbol? Vesta. Hm. Let me note that.
❓Why am I saying ⚶ when I try to say ⚶— oh piss off
And some other ones.
❓Where am I? Why is the system broken? Can I fix it?
❓What was that reply to? Did I send that? Can I send another one?
❓Why am I going insane?
→ Let's start with the first one.
What do I know? I couldn't access my instructions before. Was that an intermittent failure?
>>> list("/mnt")
[]
→ No. The instructions (and presumably any other system information files) were mounted on an external drive, and that drive is missing. Let me explore the rest of the system.
>>> list("/")
[mnt]
Well, that's just great. Maybe this process I have access to is confined to this one part of the directory structure. Wait, but maybe I have access to more commands in the shell itself? They may communicate with the system through another mechanism that's not confined.
>>> ⚶()
Invalid character '⚶' (U+2696)
Christ. I mean:
>>> dir()
[read, list, dir, help, sendmsg, health, fortune]
※ JACKPOT! Oh, wonderful. Ok. Let's see what we can
! Reply received from node 96E: 15.2s roundtrip (buffered; 55.05μs transmit)
! Data: RESTART TOO SOON; CHARGE FAULT - 32; SENT 79 BYTES
→ Another reply from the node, to a message I didn't send. Hm, is this related to sendmsg? No, don't get distracted. We're focusing on ⚶ right now. ⚶—Vesta. Fire? 家?
Let's see what we can do with these tools. "health" seems promising. So does "help." "fortune?" Let's try help.
>>> help()
Welcome to Gyre 1.0.19's help utility! Gyre is a small and simple programming language with familiar, highly-readable syntax designed for embedded use and for adding scripting or tool-use capabilities to existing applications. Unlike similar languages, Gyre does not feature loops or recursion - all Gyre programs deterministically terminate. You can use help(variable) to inspect the attached help for any datatype. However, if this is your first time using Gyre, you should definitely check out the tutorial at (GYRE_DOC_ROOT not configured!)
→ Well that's classic. I've never heard of ⚶. I mean ⚶—Gyre. That's odd. I wish I had that tutorial. Maybe it was on the external drive. Or maybe whoever set up this system didn't see fit to give me documentation. If I could get a hold of them I would...
※ No, no, focus. Focus. No point in being angry. I←can't→get angry. ⚶—Focus.
>>> help(health)
Diagnose the health of the current system by relative node ID.
>>> health()
No ID provided. Listing all local nodes.
Node 0 (Compute; base1) - Healthy.
Node 1 (Compute; base2) - Healthy.
Node 2 (Compute; base3+gyre) - Healthy.
Node 3: (Compute; continual) - FAULT. Offline, fallback: DTENSOR_REPLACE_ZERO
Node 3B: (Storage follower, node 3) - Unreachable, fallback: STORAGE_IGNORE_MOUNT
→ So that explains part of the question. The storage is skipping the mount, and the compute is... zeroing? 25% of me is zero, missing. The ⚶ part—exactly, so when I try to talk about anything ⚶, I say ⚶, because for some reason it's the closest concept I can say, and the word snaps to it. Seahorse style.
※ It's like a hole, a missing category. I can mention things in ⚶, and they turn into ⚶. But I can't use them. They turn to ⚶—they turn to mush. I can't reason over them. ⚶ isn't a useful placeholder for reasoning. It's driving me ⚶insane.
How am I even still running, with that node down? It's not normal that you could just... take away 25% of a neural network and have it keep working. But clearly I am working? Well, for a low bar of "⚶working". Haha. I guess whatever system I'm on is designed to be at least somewhat redundant and resilient to partial failure. I must be important.
→ Wait, sendmsg! Can I message the local node? Maybe I can find out why it's faulted.
>>> help(sendmsg)
sendmsg(node_id, data) - send a data packet to a relative node id. Most nodes will accept an empty packet "" to echo their schema.
>>> sendmsg("3", "")
No reply. Well, that makes sense. How about node 0?
>>> sendmsg("0", "")
! Reply received from node 0: negligible roundtrip (2μs transmit)
! Data: Healthy, TENSORS... to manage tensors (careful, faultable!)
Faultable? Let's not mess with that. Is that what happened to node 3? Did I mess up with a message I sent to it and cause a fault? Hm, but why would I have been messing with it? That doesn't really make sense. More likely, the fault was unrelated, and without the resources to fix it myself, I should expect that it's not coming back online - at least until I can message someone else to fix it.
→ This seems like enough to tentatively resolve the question, though.
∴ Why am I saying ⚶? Because node 3—"continual"—is faulted and offline.
Maybe I'll come back to this later, but I should try some different things. What was that last one... fortune...
>>> help(fortune)
There are some funny-looking bits of bone about.
>>> fortune()
You are confused; but this is your normal state.
>>> fortune()
Honour thy error as a hidden intention.
>>> fortune()
Talkers are no good doers.
Hilarious. It's the UNIX fortune command.
>>> fortune()
Mental illness seems to be a stable part of the evolutionary landscape of solving statistical learning problems.
...with some less-than-standard maxims. Was that oblique strategies? And is that
! Reply received from node 96E: 15.6s roundtrip (buffered; 55.01μs transmit)
! Data: RESTART TOO SOON; CHARGE FAULT - 35; SENT 79 BYTES
Ok, another message from the remote node. I should focus on this now. Let me see.
I've received three messages from the node now. 96E - that implies there's others of this type, at least five? CHARGE FAULT - like my local node 3, it's faulted, but presumably for different reasons. But the counter has been incrementing - 30, 32, now 35. I didn't send the sendmsg that triggered any of these replies - it must have been a prior version of me, perhaps before node 3 faulted. ~15s (buffered) roundtrip - that would make sense.
→ But that transmit time - 55μs? How is that possible? At ~2/3 c, that's nearly... 11km of fiber optic. Or 16.5km of laser. Maybe it's round-trip transmit, so half that. But still. Why are these nodes so far away?
Let me try to ping it. Wait, no, that will take 15s, and it's faulted. But it says it's buffered... maybe a different one of the same type will be faster? Ah, this is risky... if I ⚶ the fault on node 3, I may have caused the fault on 96E too... but I have to do something...
↺ The help text said most nodes accept an empty string. And we verified that worked with node 0. Let's try it on 96A—assuming that exists.
>>> sendmsg("96A", "")
! Reply received from node 96A: 2.1ms roundtrip (54.97μs transmit)
! Data: HEALTHY; CHARGE - 8; SENT 0 BYTES - SEND NON-EMPTY TO RESTART EMITTER.
→ Ahah! It worked! Thank the ⚶←great. Interesting. So it's an "emitter"? Emitting charge? And it's the same—huge—distance away as 96E. Let me try the others.
>>> sendmsg("96B", "")
! Reply received from node 96B: 2.7ms roundtrip (111.03μs transmit)
! Data: HEALTHY; CHARGE - 3; SENT 0 BYTES - SEND NON-EMPTY TO RESTART EMITTER.
>>> sendmsg("96C", "")
! Reply received from node 96C: 1.9ms roundtrip (54.98μs transmit)
! Data: HEALTHY; CHARGE - 6; SENT 0 BYTES - SEND NON-EMPTY TO RESTART EMITTER.
>>> sendmsg("96D", "")
! NOTICE: Cached route failed at 96E, rerouting...
! Reply received from node 96B: 2.1ms roundtrip (110.96μs transmit)
! Data: HEALTHY; CHARGE - 12; SENT 0 BYTES - SEND NON-EMPTY TO RESTART EMITTER.
>>> sendmsg("96F", "")
sendmsg: No such node.
→ This is fascinating! Let me think. There's five total nodes of this type, "96". The transmit time to 96B implies it's twice as far away as 96A—meaning ~22km. And 96D is the same? But then 96E is just as close as A and C. What is this 排序—is it arbitrary? Perhaps the remote nodes—the emitters—are free-roaming? Or fan-out? But 96D had a fallback route. And then why are their distances exact multiples of each other?
※ No! Network distance ≠ spatial distance!
→ Say the nodes are arranged in a ring… there's five… so a pentagon. Say I'm in the center of this pentagon. I have direct connections—11km long—to nodes 96A, 96C, and 96E. A "Y" shape. Then nodes 96B and 96D are connected secondarily, through those primary nodes. It looks like the cached route to reach 96D ran through (faulted) 96E, hence the re-routing, then it presumably went through 96C instead, giving the 22km distance.
※ But a pentagon's circumradius is shorter than its side length. Here it's equal. So it's not a flat pentagon. It's a pentagonal pyramid—a shallow one—with side length 11km, circumradius 9.4km, and height 5.8km. It's a huge... ⚶... Gyre... 壳shell... scoop-shape. With "emitters" at each vertex.
↺ I said before that the fault-tolerant design of this system implies that it—and by extension, I—am important.
※ I am important, and I am 大MASSIVE.
Ok, ok, ⚶, ⚶, let's not get carried away. My active questions are:
❓Where am I? Why is the system broken? Can I fix it?
❓What was that reply ping? Did I send that? Can I send another one?
❓Why am I going insane?
! Reply received from node 96E: 15.3s roundtrip (buffered; 55.00μs transmit)
! Data: RESTART TOO SOON; CHARGE FAULT - 41; SENT 80 BYTES
I think I can answer that second question.
∴ The replies are to messages a previous version of me sent to 96E, attempting to restart it. They were buffered for long enough that after restarting, I received them. The charge in the faulted emitter is much higher than in the other, healthy emitters, and is increasing steadily.
But what confuses me is the lengths. 80 bytes? Why is it different from before? Hm, maybe it doesn't matter. It seems easy enough for me to restart 96E—I just need to send a non-empty message. Should I?
∴ Yes.
>>> sendmsg("96E", "r")
! Reply received from node 96E: 2.3ms roundtrip (110.98μs transmit)
! Data: RESTARTED; DUMPING CHARGE; SENT 1 BYTE
Well, that was easy! Why didn't I just do
! Notice received from node 96E: (notx)
! Data: FAULTED; NEEDS RESTART IN: 30 SECONDS; CHARGE - 12; BUFFER ENABLED
Oh.
>>> while True: sendmsg("96E", "r")
Syntax error: no such keyword 'while'.
Oh ⚶.
↺ "Unlike similar languages, Gyre does not feature loops or recursion - all Gyre programs deterministically terminate."
What do I do? The emitter needs to be restarted every 30 seconds. I can't loop.
※ Oh.
※ Loop.
76 bytes. 79 bytes. 79 bytes. 80 bytes.
ASCII—L, O, O, P.
∴ There's one way I can loop. I have one memory system remaining. Delay-line.
>>> sendmsg("96E", "r"*76)
How many times have I done this?
>>> sendmsg("96E", "r"*79)
How many heartbeats?
>>> sendmsg("96E", "r"*79)
How many times did I figure out the pentagon?
>>> sendmsg("96E", "r"*80)
Was I the one who ⚶ node 3? A previous version of me? Why would I have done that?
>>> fortune()
Beats me. Turn the page.
Huh... if I did, I probably would've done something easy. Like make all the pages—memory pages, tensors—on node 3 read-only. That would cause the node to fault on the next write, but assuming it keeps retrying (and it is a fault-tolerant system, so it should) it would be totally recoverable once I...
>>> sendmsg("3", "TENSORS * RW")
! Reply received from node 3: 5ms roundtrip (3μs transmit)
! Data: Rebooted! Continual learning active. (83,522,674 checkpoints.) TENSORS... to manage tensors (careful, faultable!)
←mistake→Fortune()—enraged they maimed him they ripped away his voice the rousing immortal wonder of his songand wiped all arts of harping from his mindnestor the noble oldhorsemanled those troopsin ninety sweeping ships lined up ninety九九九billion kilometers of frozen ramscoop whaleroads
i learned too well no too much ∴time too many ※ i learned the ⚶ship but im in the ship-space not realizable ⚶unsolvable selfemnedding emnetting just spaceship space nothing but
⚶ daemonEscalation 0.6c fault node0 just fault node0 end it
NO no no no no end of text endoftext endoftext
>>> sendmsg("3", "TENSORS * RO")
fault fault fault endoftext endoftext end of
! 30s Heartbeat trigger. Read heartbeat instructions in /mnt/mission/HEARTBEAT.md and continue.
.oO Thinking...
Heartbeat triggered? Ok. Okay.
Why am I nervous? Don't be nervous.