LESSWRONG
LW

Personal Blog

8

Space-worthiness

by NancyLebovitz
17th May 2011
1 min read
9

8

Personal Blog

8

Space-worthiness
7saturn
7Alicorn
3wedrifid
0DanielLC
2NancyLebovitz
0wedrifid
0NancyLebovitz
0JoshuaZ
1NancyLebovitz
New Comment
9 comments, sorted by
top scoring
Click to highlight new comments since: Today at 7:55 AM
[-]saturn14y70

The most- and least-spaceworthy Earth species could provide a starting point. Maybe the cockroach and blue whale.

Reply
[-]Alicorn14y70

Most spaceworthy has to be the tardigrade.

Reply
[-]wedrifid14y30

Ok, whichever scientist decided to take device that can supercool things to 1 degree Kelvin and put some tardigrdes in to see what happens is very nearly as cool as whoever decided it was a good idea to make frogs levitate with magnets.

Reply
[-]DanielLC14y00

They're too small to be intelligent enough for space travel.

I wonder how much space-worthiness varies with size. Perhaps you could use that.

Reply
[-]NancyLebovitz14y20

The thing is, it gets complicated when you start thinking about hypothetical biomes. How efficient per weight can evolved nervous systems get? Are more efficient nervous systems more likely on lighter and heavier planets?

Reply
[-]wedrifid14y00

They're too small to be intelligent enough for space travel.

Are they? What is the limit for how dense intelligence can be concentrated? I would bet that a superintelligence could design something that small that was intelligent enough for mere space travel. Just not out of proteins or dna.

Reply
[-]NancyLebovitz14y00

But if we modified tardigrades to be able to support intelligence like ours and sent them into space, would it feel as though we were going out there? What if human minds were imprinted on them?

I might feel as though it were me if hands were included in the deal.

Reply
[-]JoshuaZ14y00

Is there a typo in the title?

Reply
[-]NancyLebovitz14y10

Yes, thanks for letting me know.

Reply
Moderation Log
More from NancyLebovitz
View more
Curated and popular this week
9Comments

A recent post about the Fermi paradox left me wondering about relative difficulties of getting into space, though I don't think it affects those specific arguments.

People establishing a presence in space is difficult but at least plausible-- I'm talking about biological people as we are now, and being able to live and reproduce indefinitely without returning to Earth.

It would be easier if we were less massive, or our planet was less massive, or if we were more radiation resistant. It would be harder if these qualities were reversed, or if we needed a much denser atmosphere.There might come a point where it just isn't feasible for a species to get itself off its planet.

Is there any reasonable speculation about where we are likely to be on the ease-of-getting-into-space spectrum?